TY - JOUR
T1 - Parents' perspectives on safety in neonatal intensive care
T2 - A mixed-methods study
AU - Lyndon, Audrey
AU - Jacobson, Carrie H.
AU - Fagan, Kelly M.
AU - Wisner, Kirsten
AU - Franck, Linda S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014, BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
PY - 2014/11/1
Y1 - 2014/11/1
N2 - Background & objectives: Little is known about how parents think about neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) safety. Due to their physiologic immaturity and small size, infants in NICUs are especially vulnerable to injury from their medical care. Campaigns are underway to integrate patients and family members into patient safety. This study aimed to describe how parents of infants in the NICU conceptualise patient safety and what kinds of concerns they have about safety. Methods: This mixed-methods study employed questionnaires, interviews and observation with parents of infant patients in an academic medical centre NICU. Measures included parent stress, family-centredness and types of safety concerns. Results: 46 parents completed questionnaires and 14 of these parents also participated in 10 interviews (including 4 couple interviews). Infants had a range of medical and surgical problems, including prematurity, congenital diaphragmatic hernia and congenital cardiac disease. Parents were positive about their infants' care and had low levels of concern about the safety of procedures. Parents reporting more stress had more concerns. We identified three overlapping domains in parents' conceptualisations of safety in the NICU, including physical, developmental and emotional safety. Parents demonstrated sophisticated understanding of how environmental, treatment and personnel factors could potentially influence their infants' developmental and emotional health. Conclusions: Parents have safety concerns that cannot be addressed solely by reducing errors in the NICU. Parent engagement strategies that respect parents as partners in safety and address how clinical treatment articulates with physical, developmental and emotional safety domains may result in safety improvements.
AB - Background & objectives: Little is known about how parents think about neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) safety. Due to their physiologic immaturity and small size, infants in NICUs are especially vulnerable to injury from their medical care. Campaigns are underway to integrate patients and family members into patient safety. This study aimed to describe how parents of infants in the NICU conceptualise patient safety and what kinds of concerns they have about safety. Methods: This mixed-methods study employed questionnaires, interviews and observation with parents of infant patients in an academic medical centre NICU. Measures included parent stress, family-centredness and types of safety concerns. Results: 46 parents completed questionnaires and 14 of these parents also participated in 10 interviews (including 4 couple interviews). Infants had a range of medical and surgical problems, including prematurity, congenital diaphragmatic hernia and congenital cardiac disease. Parents were positive about their infants' care and had low levels of concern about the safety of procedures. Parents reporting more stress had more concerns. We identified three overlapping domains in parents' conceptualisations of safety in the NICU, including physical, developmental and emotional safety. Parents demonstrated sophisticated understanding of how environmental, treatment and personnel factors could potentially influence their infants' developmental and emotional health. Conclusions: Parents have safety concerns that cannot be addressed solely by reducing errors in the NICU. Parent engagement strategies that respect parents as partners in safety and address how clinical treatment articulates with physical, developmental and emotional safety domains may result in safety improvements.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908021225&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908021225&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003009
DO - 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003009
M3 - Article
C2 - 24970266
AN - SCOPUS:84908021225
SN - 2044-5415
VL - 23
SP - 902
EP - 909
JO - BMJ Quality and Safety
JF - BMJ Quality and Safety
IS - 11
ER -