TY - JOUR
T1 - Party Cohesion in Westminster Systems
T2 - Inducements, Replacement and Discipline in the House of Commons, 1836-1910
AU - Eggers, Andrew C.
AU - Spirling, Arthur
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Cambridge University Press.
PY - 2014/7/7
Y1 - 2014/7/7
N2 - This article considers the historical development of a characteristic crucial for the functioning and normative appeal of Westminster systems: cohesive legislative parties. It gathers the universe of the 20,000 parliamentary divisions that took place between 1836 and 1910 in the British House of Commons, construct a voting record for every Member of Parliament (MP) serving during this time, and conducts analysis that aims to both describe and explain the development of cohesive party voting. In line with previous work, it shows that - with the exception of a chaotic period in the 1840s and 1850s - median discipline was always high and increased throughout the century. The study uses novel methods to demonstrate that much of the rise in cohesion results from the elimination of a rebellious 'left tail' from the 1860s onwards, rather than central tendency shifts. In explaining the aggregate trends, the article uses panel data techniques and notes that there is scant evidence for 'replacement' explanations that involve new members behaving in more disciplined ways than those leaving the chamber. It offers evidence that more loyal MPs were more likely to obtain ministerial posts, and speculates that this and other 'inducement'-based accounts offer more promising explanations of increasingly cohesive parties.
AB - This article considers the historical development of a characteristic crucial for the functioning and normative appeal of Westminster systems: cohesive legislative parties. It gathers the universe of the 20,000 parliamentary divisions that took place between 1836 and 1910 in the British House of Commons, construct a voting record for every Member of Parliament (MP) serving during this time, and conducts analysis that aims to both describe and explain the development of cohesive party voting. In line with previous work, it shows that - with the exception of a chaotic period in the 1840s and 1850s - median discipline was always high and increased throughout the century. The study uses novel methods to demonstrate that much of the rise in cohesion results from the elimination of a rebellious 'left tail' from the 1860s onwards, rather than central tendency shifts. In explaining the aggregate trends, the article uses panel data techniques and notes that there is scant evidence for 'replacement' explanations that involve new members behaving in more disciplined ways than those leaving the chamber. It offers evidence that more loyal MPs were more likely to obtain ministerial posts, and speculates that this and other 'inducement'-based accounts offer more promising explanations of increasingly cohesive parties.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84916898866&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84916898866&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S0007123414000362
DO - 10.1017/S0007123414000362
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84916898866
SN - 0007-1234
VL - 46
SP - 567
EP - 589
JO - British Journal of Political Science
JF - British Journal of Political Science
IS - 3
ER -