TY - JOUR
T1 - Pathways to Skin Color Stratification
T2 - The Role of Inherited (Dis)Advantage and Skin Color Discrimination in Labor Markets
AU - Abascal, Maria
AU - Garcia, Denia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s). This open-access article has been published under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction, in any form, as long as the original author and source have been credited
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Research has uncovered associations between skin color and myriad outcomes. What drives these associations? We develop a theoretical framework that synthesizes the multiple pathways linking skin color with life chances. Skin color stratification should be conceptualized in historical, structural terms: as the result of unequal treatment and inherited (dis)advantage, that is, unequal resources transmitted by families with different skin tones. We assess the role of two pathways— discrimination and inherited (dis)advantage—for Blacks’ and Latinos’ employment, earnings, and occupational prestige. We use the National Longitudinal Study of Youth 1997, which includes a visual skin color measure; multiple indicators of family background; and a sibling subsample that allows us, using fixed-effects models, to recover the effect of skin color net of family background. First, we find that darker skin tone is associated with worse labor market outcomes. Indicators of family background account for 29 to 44 percent of skin color’s associations with employment, earnings, and occupational prestige. Second, using sibling fixed-effects models, we find that darker skin tone is associated with worse labor market outcomes, but these associations are not statistically significant.
AB - Research has uncovered associations between skin color and myriad outcomes. What drives these associations? We develop a theoretical framework that synthesizes the multiple pathways linking skin color with life chances. Skin color stratification should be conceptualized in historical, structural terms: as the result of unequal treatment and inherited (dis)advantage, that is, unequal resources transmitted by families with different skin tones. We assess the role of two pathways— discrimination and inherited (dis)advantage—for Blacks’ and Latinos’ employment, earnings, and occupational prestige. We use the National Longitudinal Study of Youth 1997, which includes a visual skin color measure; multiple indicators of family background; and a sibling subsample that allows us, using fixed-effects models, to recover the effect of skin color net of family background. First, we find that darker skin tone is associated with worse labor market outcomes. Indicators of family background account for 29 to 44 percent of skin color’s associations with employment, earnings, and occupational prestige. Second, using sibling fixed-effects models, we find that darker skin tone is associated with worse labor market outcomes, but these associations are not statistically significant.
KW - Colorism
KW - Inequality
KW - Labor markets
KW - Race
KW - Skin color
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138159269&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85138159269&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.15195/V9.A14
DO - 10.15195/V9.A14
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85138159269
SN - 2330-6696
VL - 9
SP - 346
EP - 373
JO - Sociological Science
JF - Sociological Science
ER -