TY - JOUR
T1 - Pattern recognition over distortions, by human subjects and by a computer simulation of a model for human form perception
AU - Uhr, Leonard
AU - Vossler, Charles
AU - Uleman, James
PY - 1962/3
Y1 - 1962/3
N2 - Human Ss, and a computer simulation program of a model for form perception, were examined for their behavior in learning to respond with the proper name for a pattern type over variant examples of the pattern. In the main experiment, five pattern types of five variants each were presented to all Ss (including the simulation program). Four "conditions" were examined: (a) unrelated patterns, (b) interrelated patterns; each presented as the first, and as the second, set. Differences between Ss, and between "passes" through the set (learning trials) were also examined. All of the above variables showed differences significant beyond the .001 level. In particular, the simulation of the model performed at a significantly lower error rate (beyond the .005 level) than did the group of human Ss. The effects, on human Ss, or varying (a) duration of stimulus presentation, (b) size of the set of patterns, and (c) complexity of patterns were also examined. Only complexity of pattern affected performance significantly. In addition, three experiments by other investigators who tested human Ss were replicated, to test the computer model. The model outperformed human Ss in all cases. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).
AB - Human Ss, and a computer simulation program of a model for form perception, were examined for their behavior in learning to respond with the proper name for a pattern type over variant examples of the pattern. In the main experiment, five pattern types of five variants each were presented to all Ss (including the simulation program). Four "conditions" were examined: (a) unrelated patterns, (b) interrelated patterns; each presented as the first, and as the second, set. Differences between Ss, and between "passes" through the set (learning trials) were also examined. All of the above variables showed differences significant beyond the .001 level. In particular, the simulation of the model performed at a significantly lower error rate (beyond the .005 level) than did the group of human Ss. The effects, on human Ss, or varying (a) duration of stimulus presentation, (b) size of the set of patterns, and (c) complexity of patterns were also examined. Only complexity of pattern affected performance significantly. In addition, three experiments by other investigators who tested human Ss were replicated, to test the computer model. The model outperformed human Ss in all cases. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).
KW - computer simulation
KW - form perception
KW - humans
KW - pattern recognition
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35048820588&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35048820588&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/h0038404
DO - 10.1037/h0038404
M3 - Article
C2 - 13923606
AN - SCOPUS:35048820588
SN - 0022-1015
VL - 63
SP - 227
EP - 234
JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology
JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology
IS - 3
ER -