Paying in pieces: A natural experiment on demand for life insurance under different payment schemes

Jonathan Bauchet, Jonathan Morduch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Risk is pervasive in low-income economies, but insurance markets tend to be under-developed and demand for existing products is often low and poorly understood. Usually, customers must buy insurance by making a single lump-sum payment. We study a popular life insurance product sold by Mexico's leading microfinance institution. We exploit a large-scale natural experiment involving 200,000 poor female microcredit customers and show that demand increased by 59–74 percent when customers were allowed to pay in weekly installments instead of in a lump sum, even though doing so was more costly for them. The finding is not explained by price or income, which do not change. We describe the possible roles of liquidity constraints and other explanations, and relate the result to discussions of demand for microinsurance and other products, including merit goods, in similar contexts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)69-77
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Development Economics
Volume139
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2019

Keywords

  • Discount rates
  • Liquidity constraints
  • Merit goods
  • Mexico
  • Present bias
  • Saving constraints

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Development
  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Paying in pieces: A natural experiment on demand for life insurance under different payment schemes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this