Penal controls and social controls: Toward a theory of American penal exceptionalism

David Garland

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This article argues that to explain American penal exceptionalism, we have to consider America’s exceptional levels of punishment together with America’s exceptional levels of violence and disorder, while understanding both of these as outcomes of America’s distinctive political economy. After specifying the multiple respects in which American penality is a comparative outlier, the article develops a new theorization of modes of penal action that reveals the extent to which the US has come to rely on penal controls rather than other kinds of punishment. This over-reliance on penal controls is viewed as an adaptation to the weakness of non-penal social controls in American communities. These social control deficits are, in turn, attributed to America’s ultra-liberal political economy, which is seen as having detrimental effects for the functioning of families and communities, tending to reduce the effectiveness of informal social controls and to generate high levels of neighborhood disorganization and violence. The same political economy limits the capacity of government to respond to these structurally generated problems using the social policy interventions characteristic of more fully developed welfare states. The result is a marked bias toward the use of penal controls.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)321-352
    Number of pages32
    JournalPunishment and Society
    Volume22
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jul 1 2020

    Keywords

    • criminal punishment
    • modes of penal action
    • penal controls
    • penal exceptionalism
    • political economy
    • social controls
    • state capacity

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
    • Law

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Penal controls and social controls: Toward a theory of American penal exceptionalism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this