Perception, as you make it

David W. Vinson; Drew H. Abney; Dima Amso; Anthony Chemero; James E. Cutting; Rick Dale; Jonathan B. Freeman; Laurie B. Feldman; Karl J. Friston; Shaun Gallagher; J. Scott Jordan; Liad Mudrik; Sasha Ondobaka; Daniel C. Richardson; Ladan Shams; Maggie Shiffrar; Michael J. Spivey

doi:10.1017/S0140525X15002678

Perception, as you make it

David W. Vinson, Drew H. Abney, Dima Amso, Anthony Chemero, James E. Cutting, Rick Dale, Jonathan B. Freeman, Laurie B. Feldman, Karl J. Friston, Shaun Gallagher, J. Scott Jordan, Liad Mudrik, Sasha Ondobaka, Daniel C. Richardson, Ladan Shams, Maggie Shiffrar, Michael J. Spivey

Psychology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Abstract

The main question that Firestone & Scholl (F&S) pose is whether “what and how we see is functionally independent from what and how we think, know, desire, act, and so forth” (sect. 2, para. 1). We synthesize a collection of concerns from an interdisciplinary set of coauthors regarding F&S’s assumptions and appeals to intuition, resulting in their treatment of visual perception as context-free.

Original language	English (US)
Article number	e260
Journal	Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume	39
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15002678
State	Published - Jan 5 2016

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Physiology
Behavioral Neuroscience

Access to Document

10.1017/S0140525X15002678

Cite this

Vinson, D. W., Abney, D. H., Amso, D., Chemero, A., Cutting, J. E., Dale, R., Freeman, J. B., Feldman, L. B., Friston, K. J., Gallagher, S., Scott Jordan, J., Mudrik, L., Ondobaka, S., Richardson, D. C., Shams, L., Shiffrar, M., & Spivey, M. J. (2016). Perception, as you make it. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, Article e260. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15002678

@article{857b06b7e9514322b7d46dfbb6eea9b5,

title = "Perception, as you make it",

abstract = "The main question that Firestone & Scholl (F&S) pose is whether “what and how we see is functionally independent from what and how we think, know, desire, act, and so forth” (sect. 2, para. 1). We synthesize a collection of concerns from an interdisciplinary set of coauthors regarding F&S{\textquoteright}s assumptions and appeals to intuition, resulting in their treatment of visual perception as context-free.",

author = "Vinson, {David W.} and Abney, {Drew H.} and Dima Amso and Anthony Chemero and Cutting, {James E.} and Rick Dale and Freeman, {Jonathan B.} and Feldman, {Laurie B.} and Friston, {Karl J.} and Shaun Gallagher and {Scott Jordan}, J. and Liad Mudrik and Sasha Ondobaka and Richardson, {Daniel C.} and Ladan Shams and Maggie Shiffrar and Spivey, {Michael J.}",

year = "2016",

month = jan,

day = "5",

doi = "10.1017/S0140525X15002678",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "39",

journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",

issn = "0140-525X",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perception, as you make it

AU - Vinson, David W.

AU - Abney, Drew H.

AU - Amso, Dima

AU - Chemero, Anthony

AU - Cutting, James E.

AU - Dale, Rick

AU - Freeman, Jonathan B.

AU - Feldman, Laurie B.

AU - Friston, Karl J.

AU - Gallagher, Shaun

AU - Scott Jordan, J.

AU - Mudrik, Liad

AU - Ondobaka, Sasha

AU - Richardson, Daniel C.

AU - Shams, Ladan

AU - Shiffrar, Maggie

AU - Spivey, Michael J.

PY - 2016/1/5

Y1 - 2016/1/5

N2 - The main question that Firestone & Scholl (F&S) pose is whether “what and how we see is functionally independent from what and how we think, know, desire, act, and so forth” (sect. 2, para. 1). We synthesize a collection of concerns from an interdisciplinary set of coauthors regarding F&S’s assumptions and appeals to intuition, resulting in their treatment of visual perception as context-free.

AB - The main question that Firestone & Scholl (F&S) pose is whether “what and how we see is functionally independent from what and how we think, know, desire, act, and so forth” (sect. 2, para. 1). We synthesize a collection of concerns from an interdisciplinary set of coauthors regarding F&S’s assumptions and appeals to intuition, resulting in their treatment of visual perception as context-free.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048728193&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048728193&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X15002678

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X15002678

M3 - Review article

C2 - 28355860

AN - SCOPUS:85048728193

SN - 0140-525X

VL - 39

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

M1 - e260

ER -

Perception, as you make it

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this