TY - JOUR
T1 - Photographic and videographic assessment of the smile
T2 - Objective and subjective evaluations of posed and spontaneous smiles
AU - Walder, Joan F.
AU - Freeman, Katherine
AU - Lipp, Mitchell J.
AU - Nicolay, Olivier F.
AU - Cisneros, George J.
PY - 2013/12
Y1 - 2013/12
N2 - Introduction Esthetic considerations play an increasingly important role in patient care, and clinicians need a methodology that includes imaging techniques to capture the dynamic nature of the smile. Photographs of the posed smile are routinely used to guide diagnosis and treatment, but there is no standardized and validated method for recording the dynamic smile. The purposes of this study were to (1) determine whether a posed smile is reproducible, (2) compare visual and verbal cues in eliciting a smile, and (3) compare the diagnostic value of videography and photography in evaluating a patient's smile. Methods The smiles of 22 subjects were simultaneously photographed and videotaped on 2 separate occasions. For objective comparisons, measurements of the smile were obtained from 8 × 10 color still photographs and selected digitized video images. A panel consisting of a layperson, an oral surgeon, an orthodontist, and a prosthodontist subjectively assessed the reproducibility of the smile, posed vs spontaneous smiles, and the diagnostic value of video vs still images. Results Objective measurements showed that the posed smile can be reliably reproduced, whether captured by videography or still photography. However, subjectively, the panel members detected differences between the posed smiles taken on different days 80% of the time. The clinician panel members expressed a strong preference for videography over photography and for the spontaneous over the posed smiles. Conclusions This study emphasizes the need to continue to investigate and standardize the methods of eliciting and recording a smile of diagnostic quality.
AB - Introduction Esthetic considerations play an increasingly important role in patient care, and clinicians need a methodology that includes imaging techniques to capture the dynamic nature of the smile. Photographs of the posed smile are routinely used to guide diagnosis and treatment, but there is no standardized and validated method for recording the dynamic smile. The purposes of this study were to (1) determine whether a posed smile is reproducible, (2) compare visual and verbal cues in eliciting a smile, and (3) compare the diagnostic value of videography and photography in evaluating a patient's smile. Methods The smiles of 22 subjects were simultaneously photographed and videotaped on 2 separate occasions. For objective comparisons, measurements of the smile were obtained from 8 × 10 color still photographs and selected digitized video images. A panel consisting of a layperson, an oral surgeon, an orthodontist, and a prosthodontist subjectively assessed the reproducibility of the smile, posed vs spontaneous smiles, and the diagnostic value of video vs still images. Results Objective measurements showed that the posed smile can be reliably reproduced, whether captured by videography or still photography. However, subjectively, the panel members detected differences between the posed smiles taken on different days 80% of the time. The clinician panel members expressed a strong preference for videography over photography and for the spontaneous over the posed smiles. Conclusions This study emphasizes the need to continue to investigate and standardize the methods of eliciting and recording a smile of diagnostic quality.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888614268&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84888614268&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.07.012
DO - 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.07.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 24286903
AN - SCOPUS:84888614268
SN - 0889-5406
VL - 144
SP - 793
EP - 801
JO - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
JF - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
IS - 6
ER -