Abstract
Previous research suggests that societal threats often increase ideological support for the social system, but the attitudinal effects of COVID-19 seem to have varied greatly. Here we present the results of a natural experiment involving New York City college students (Total N = 1300 observations). One group (n = 835) completed questionnaires before the onset of COVID-19, while another completed them afterward (n = 465). Shortly after COVID (within 3 months of the outbreak), students scored higher on general system justification than before; this effect was driven by political conservatives. At the same time, students scored lower on economic system justification and right-wing authoritarianism after COVID (vs. before); these effects emerged later (4–5 months after the outbreak) and were driven by liberals. A subsample completed the same questionnaires both before and after COVID-19 (n = 107), enabling us to investigate intraindividual change. The within-participants analysis revealed that students exhibited an increase in general system justification and a decrease in economic system justification, which was driven by those who exhibited a liberal shift. Together, these results indicate that the ideological effects of the pandemic and the governmental response to it were complex and polarizing, with liberals and conservatives moving in opposite directions at different times and on different attitudinal dimensions.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Journal | Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy |
DOIs | |
State | Accepted/In press - 2024 |
Keywords
- COVID-19
- economic attitudes
- pandemic disease
- political ideology
- system justification
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Social Sciences
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law