Political neuroscience

The beginning of a beautiful friendship

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The emergence of political neuroscience-an interdisciplinary venture involving political science, psychology, and cognitive neuroscience-has piqued the interests of scholars as well as the mass public. In this chapter, we review evidence pertaining to four areas of inquiry that have generated most of the research in political neuroscience to date: (1) racial prejudice and intergroup relations; (2) the existence of partisan bias and motivated political cognition; (3) the nature of left-right differences in political orientation; and (4) the dimensional structure of political attitudes. Although these topics are well-known to political psychologists, the application of models and methods from neuroscience has renewed interest in each of them and yielded novel insights. There is reason to believe that many other areas of political psychology await similarly promising renewals and that innovative methods will continue to advance our understanding of the physiological processes involved in political cognition, evaluation, judgment, and behavior. We address limitations, criticisms, and potential pitfalls of existing work-including the "chicken-and-egg problem"-and propose an ambitious agenda for the next generation of research in political neuroscience.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-42
Number of pages40
JournalPolitical Psychology
Volume35
Issue numberSUPPL.1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2014

Fingerprint

Neurosciences
neurosciences
friendship
Psychology
Cognition
political attitude
Physiological Phenomena
cognition
Racism
political psychology
Research
Ovum
Chickens
psychologist
prejudice
political science
criticism
psychology
Friendship
Neuroscience

Keywords

  • Ideology
  • Partisanship
  • Political neuroscience
  • Racial prejudice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Philosophy

Cite this

Political neuroscience : The beginning of a beautiful friendship. / Jost, John T.; Nam, H. Hannah; Amodio, David M.; Van Bavel, Jay J.

In: Political Psychology, Vol. 35, No. SUPPL.1, 02.2014, p. 3-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{938c990d44444dcf9b414161f03b602f,
title = "Political neuroscience: The beginning of a beautiful friendship",
abstract = "The emergence of political neuroscience-an interdisciplinary venture involving political science, psychology, and cognitive neuroscience-has piqued the interests of scholars as well as the mass public. In this chapter, we review evidence pertaining to four areas of inquiry that have generated most of the research in political neuroscience to date: (1) racial prejudice and intergroup relations; (2) the existence of partisan bias and motivated political cognition; (3) the nature of left-right differences in political orientation; and (4) the dimensional structure of political attitudes. Although these topics are well-known to political psychologists, the application of models and methods from neuroscience has renewed interest in each of them and yielded novel insights. There is reason to believe that many other areas of political psychology await similarly promising renewals and that innovative methods will continue to advance our understanding of the physiological processes involved in political cognition, evaluation, judgment, and behavior. We address limitations, criticisms, and potential pitfalls of existing work-including the {"}chicken-and-egg problem{"}-and propose an ambitious agenda for the next generation of research in political neuroscience.",
keywords = "Ideology, Partisanship, Political neuroscience, Racial prejudice",
author = "Jost, {John T.} and Nam, {H. Hannah} and Amodio, {David M.} and {Van Bavel}, {Jay J.}",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1111/pops.12162",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "3--42",
journal = "Political Psychology",
issn = "0162-895X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "SUPPL.1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Political neuroscience

T2 - The beginning of a beautiful friendship

AU - Jost, John T.

AU - Nam, H. Hannah

AU - Amodio, David M.

AU - Van Bavel, Jay J.

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - The emergence of political neuroscience-an interdisciplinary venture involving political science, psychology, and cognitive neuroscience-has piqued the interests of scholars as well as the mass public. In this chapter, we review evidence pertaining to four areas of inquiry that have generated most of the research in political neuroscience to date: (1) racial prejudice and intergroup relations; (2) the existence of partisan bias and motivated political cognition; (3) the nature of left-right differences in political orientation; and (4) the dimensional structure of political attitudes. Although these topics are well-known to political psychologists, the application of models and methods from neuroscience has renewed interest in each of them and yielded novel insights. There is reason to believe that many other areas of political psychology await similarly promising renewals and that innovative methods will continue to advance our understanding of the physiological processes involved in political cognition, evaluation, judgment, and behavior. We address limitations, criticisms, and potential pitfalls of existing work-including the "chicken-and-egg problem"-and propose an ambitious agenda for the next generation of research in political neuroscience.

AB - The emergence of political neuroscience-an interdisciplinary venture involving political science, psychology, and cognitive neuroscience-has piqued the interests of scholars as well as the mass public. In this chapter, we review evidence pertaining to four areas of inquiry that have generated most of the research in political neuroscience to date: (1) racial prejudice and intergroup relations; (2) the existence of partisan bias and motivated political cognition; (3) the nature of left-right differences in political orientation; and (4) the dimensional structure of political attitudes. Although these topics are well-known to political psychologists, the application of models and methods from neuroscience has renewed interest in each of them and yielded novel insights. There is reason to believe that many other areas of political psychology await similarly promising renewals and that innovative methods will continue to advance our understanding of the physiological processes involved in political cognition, evaluation, judgment, and behavior. We address limitations, criticisms, and potential pitfalls of existing work-including the "chicken-and-egg problem"-and propose an ambitious agenda for the next generation of research in political neuroscience.

KW - Ideology

KW - Partisanship

KW - Political neuroscience

KW - Racial prejudice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892887140&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892887140&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/pops.12162

DO - 10.1111/pops.12162

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 3

EP - 42

JO - Political Psychology

JF - Political Psychology

SN - 0162-895X

IS - SUPPL.1

ER -