Political sociological models of the U.S. New Deal

Jeff Manza

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


    The U.S. New Deal raises issues of class, race, gender, region, social movements, and institutional constraint in the context of a societal-wide economic and political crisis, and has not surprisingly generated a considerable body of work by political sociologists over the past twenty years. In particular, the New Deal has served as a major empirical context for developing, testing, or applying broader theoretical models of political change in the United States. In this sense, it is a paradigmatic example of the "historical turn" in the social sciences. This paper examines the theoretical and empirical controversies that have persisted between four competing theoretical models of New Deal political change: (a) those emphasizing the importance of social movements from below in generating momentum for political reform, (b) those high-lighting the centrality of business influence on successful New Deal reform initiatives, (c) feminist models, and (d) historical institutional models. I then turn to a survey of more recent work on some of the topics that have been the most widely debated in more recent scholarship and pose some questions for future research.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)297-322
    Number of pages26
    JournalAnnual Review of Sociology
    StatePublished - 2000


    • New Deal
    • Political change
    • Political sociology

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science


    Dive into the research topics of 'Political sociological models of the U.S. New Deal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this