TY - JOUR
T1 - Polysemy in sentence comprehension
T2 - Effects of meaning dominance
AU - Foraker, Stephani
AU - Murphy, Gregory L.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by NIMH Grant MH41704. We thank Kim Larrimore, Robyn Kim, Andrea Martin, and Julie Van Dyke for their help with data collection, and Doug Roland and Hong Oak Yun for assistance with the LMER analyses. We thank Brian McElree, Steven Frisson, Keith Rayner, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on previous versions of this manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2012 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2012/11/1
Y1 - 2012/11/1
N2 - Words like church are polysemous, having two related senses (a building and an organization). Three experiments investigated how polysemous senses are represented and processed during sentence comprehension. On one view, readers retrieve an underspecified, core meaning, which is later specified more fully with contextual information. On another view, readers retrieve one or more specific senses. In a reading task, context that was neutral or biased towards a particular sense preceded a polysemous word. Disambiguating material consistent with only one sense followed, in a second sentence (Experiment 1) or the same sentence (Experiments 2 and 3). Reading the disambiguating material was faster when it was consistent with that context, and dominant senses were committed to more strongly than subordinate senses. Critically, following neutral context, the continuation was read more quickly when it selected the dominant sense, and the degree of sense dominance partially explained the reading time advantage. Similarity of the senses also affected reading times. Across experiments, we found that sense selection may not be completed immediately following a polysemous word but is completed at a sentence boundary. Overall, the results suggest that readers select an individual sense when reading a polysemous word, rather than a core meaning.
AB - Words like church are polysemous, having two related senses (a building and an organization). Three experiments investigated how polysemous senses are represented and processed during sentence comprehension. On one view, readers retrieve an underspecified, core meaning, which is later specified more fully with contextual information. On another view, readers retrieve one or more specific senses. In a reading task, context that was neutral or biased towards a particular sense preceded a polysemous word. Disambiguating material consistent with only one sense followed, in a second sentence (Experiment 1) or the same sentence (Experiments 2 and 3). Reading the disambiguating material was faster when it was consistent with that context, and dominant senses were committed to more strongly than subordinate senses. Critically, following neutral context, the continuation was read more quickly when it selected the dominant sense, and the degree of sense dominance partially explained the reading time advantage. Similarity of the senses also affected reading times. Across experiments, we found that sense selection may not be completed immediately following a polysemous word but is completed at a sentence boundary. Overall, the results suggest that readers select an individual sense when reading a polysemous word, rather than a core meaning.
KW - Ambiguity
KW - Eye movements
KW - Lexical semantics
KW - Polysemy
KW - Psycholinguistics
KW - Underspecified representation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865591133&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865591133&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jml.2012.07.010
DO - 10.1016/j.jml.2012.07.010
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84865591133
SN - 0749-596X
VL - 67
SP - 407
EP - 425
JO - Journal of Memory and Language
JF - Journal of Memory and Language
IS - 4
ER -