TY - JOUR
T1 - Poor Oral Health in Adults and Older Adults
T2 - A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Studies
AU - Rech, Rafaela Soares
AU - Hugo, Fernando Neves
AU - Rech, Gabriela Soares
AU - Hilgert, Juliana Balbinot
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2025.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - To identify oral health variables associated with laryngotracheal aspiration-related outcomes as determined by swallowing during videofluoroscopy in adults and older adults. This cross-sectional study included 225 persons aged 18 years or older who were referred for clinical evaluation and videofluoroscopy examination due to suspected dysphagia. Oral health status assessment comprised self-reported the number of teeth, use and fit of dentures, xerostomia and satisfaction with chewing. The number of teeth and fit of dentures were also assessed clinically by a speech therapist. Videofluoroscopy followed a standardized protocol. The presence and severity of dysphagia was assessed using the O’Neill Swallowing Scale. The Dysphagia Severity and Outcome Scale defined the occurrence of laryngotracheal penetration or aspiration of food. Results were presented as prevalence ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Poisson regressions with robust variance ran on R version 4.2.1. were used to estimate associations with dysphagia and aspiration. In the multivariate models for aspiration, the following factors were associated with the upper arch: Partial dentition with poorly fitted implants, fixed prostheses (single or multiple), or removable partial dentures (PR, 3.45; 95% CI, 1.15–10.41), partial dentition without rehabilitation with prosthesis (PR, 4.05; 95% CI, 1.46–11.22), edentulism with well-fitted conventional total prosthesis (PR, 4.82; 95% CI, 1.29–17.92), and edentulism without complete dentures (PR, 7.22; 95% CI, 2.25–23.10). For the lower arch, associated factors included: Edentulism with poorly fitted conventional total prosthesis (PR, 8.99; 95% CI, 1.85–43.44), partial dentition without prosthesis (PR, 6.76; 95% CI, 1.67–27.84), and edentulism without prosthesis (PR, 8.69; 95% CI, 1.86–40.63). This study highlights the significant association between poor oral health, dysphagia, and aspiration laryngotracheal, underscoring the need for integrated care between speech-language pathology and dentistry. Our findings provide a foundation for future research that incorporates more robust research designs and oral examinations to explore underlying mechanisms explaining the relation between oral health, dysphagia, and aspiration.
AB - To identify oral health variables associated with laryngotracheal aspiration-related outcomes as determined by swallowing during videofluoroscopy in adults and older adults. This cross-sectional study included 225 persons aged 18 years or older who were referred for clinical evaluation and videofluoroscopy examination due to suspected dysphagia. Oral health status assessment comprised self-reported the number of teeth, use and fit of dentures, xerostomia and satisfaction with chewing. The number of teeth and fit of dentures were also assessed clinically by a speech therapist. Videofluoroscopy followed a standardized protocol. The presence and severity of dysphagia was assessed using the O’Neill Swallowing Scale. The Dysphagia Severity and Outcome Scale defined the occurrence of laryngotracheal penetration or aspiration of food. Results were presented as prevalence ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Poisson regressions with robust variance ran on R version 4.2.1. were used to estimate associations with dysphagia and aspiration. In the multivariate models for aspiration, the following factors were associated with the upper arch: Partial dentition with poorly fitted implants, fixed prostheses (single or multiple), or removable partial dentures (PR, 3.45; 95% CI, 1.15–10.41), partial dentition without rehabilitation with prosthesis (PR, 4.05; 95% CI, 1.46–11.22), edentulism with well-fitted conventional total prosthesis (PR, 4.82; 95% CI, 1.29–17.92), and edentulism without complete dentures (PR, 7.22; 95% CI, 2.25–23.10). For the lower arch, associated factors included: Edentulism with poorly fitted conventional total prosthesis (PR, 8.99; 95% CI, 1.85–43.44), partial dentition without prosthesis (PR, 6.76; 95% CI, 1.67–27.84), and edentulism without prosthesis (PR, 8.69; 95% CI, 1.86–40.63). This study highlights the significant association between poor oral health, dysphagia, and aspiration laryngotracheal, underscoring the need for integrated care between speech-language pathology and dentistry. Our findings provide a foundation for future research that incorporates more robust research designs and oral examinations to explore underlying mechanisms explaining the relation between oral health, dysphagia, and aspiration.
KW - Deglutition
KW - Deglutition disorders
KW - Dental prosthesis
KW - Dentistry
KW - Oral health
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=86000358431&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=86000358431&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00455-025-10820-8
DO - 10.1007/s00455-025-10820-8
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:86000358431
SN - 0179-051X
JO - Dysphagia
JF - Dysphagia
ER -