TY - JOUR
T1 - Position-Force Domain Passivity of the Human Arm in Telerobotic Systems
AU - Shahbazi, Mahya
AU - Atashzar, Seyed Farokh
AU - Tavakoli, Mahdi
AU - Patel, Rajni V.
N1 - Funding Information:
Manuscript received May 5, 2017; revised September 21, 2017; accepted January 1, 2018. Date of publication January 15, 2018; date of current version April 16, 2018. Recommended by Technical Editor J. Ryu. This work was supported in part by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) under NSERC Discovery Grant RGPIN 1345, in part by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and NSERC under a Collaborative Health Research Project under Grant 316170, in part by the AGE-WELL Network of Centres of Excellence under Grant AW CRP 2015-WP5.3, in part by the Canada Foundation for Innovation under Grant LOF 28241, in part by the Alberta Innovation and Advanced Education Ministry under Small Equipment Grant RCP-12-021, and in part by Quanser, Inc. (Corresponding author: Mahya Shahbazi.) M. Shahbazi and S. F. Atashzar are with Canadian Surgical Technologies and Advanced Robotics (CSTAR), London, ON N6A 5A5, Canada, and also with the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Western UniversityLondon, ON N6A 3K7, Canada (e-mail: mshahba2@uwo.ca; satashza@uwo.ca).
Publisher Copyright:
© 1996-2012 IEEE.
PY - 2018/4
Y1 - 2018/4
N2 - In order to guarantee safe human-robot interaction in single-master/single-slave teleoperation systems, passivity-based controllers have traditionally been developed for communication delay compensation in the velocity-force domain (VD) with the assumption of passivity of the human arm. The same controllers can also make the delayed communication channel passive in the position-force domain (PD), which provides a convenient position-drift-free control strategy for more complicated scenarios such as multi-master/single-slave systems. This would, however, only work if the operator's arm also remains passive in the PD. Whether the arm remains passive in the PD is a critical question yet to be answered. In this paper, passivity of the human arm in the PD is investigated through mathematical analysis, experimentation, and statistical user studies involving 12 subjects and 48 trials. It is shown that unlike in the VD, the human operator will not remain passive in the PD for all frequency ranges. This implies the need for appropriate control strategies to make the human operator termination passive in the PD. For future design of suitable controllers, statistical analyses are performed to investigate correlations between the levels of PD passivity of the left and the right arms of the human participants, as well as the levels of passivity of the subjects' arms and their physical characteristics, e.g., weight, height, and body mass index. Possible control strategies through which the passivity of the operator termination can be guaranteed are also discussed.
AB - In order to guarantee safe human-robot interaction in single-master/single-slave teleoperation systems, passivity-based controllers have traditionally been developed for communication delay compensation in the velocity-force domain (VD) with the assumption of passivity of the human arm. The same controllers can also make the delayed communication channel passive in the position-force domain (PD), which provides a convenient position-drift-free control strategy for more complicated scenarios such as multi-master/single-slave systems. This would, however, only work if the operator's arm also remains passive in the PD. Whether the arm remains passive in the PD is a critical question yet to be answered. In this paper, passivity of the human arm in the PD is investigated through mathematical analysis, experimentation, and statistical user studies involving 12 subjects and 48 trials. It is shown that unlike in the VD, the human operator will not remain passive in the PD for all frequency ranges. This implies the need for appropriate control strategies to make the human operator termination passive in the PD. For future design of suitable controllers, statistical analyses are performed to investigate correlations between the levels of PD passivity of the left and the right arms of the human participants, as well as the levels of passivity of the subjects' arms and their physical characteristics, e.g., weight, height, and body mass index. Possible control strategies through which the passivity of the operator termination can be guaranteed are also discussed.
KW - Arm passivity
KW - passivity-based controller
KW - position-force domain (PD) passivity
KW - teleoperation, telerobotics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041664949&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041664949&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TMECH.2018.2793877
DO - 10.1109/TMECH.2018.2793877
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85041664949
SN - 1083-4435
VL - 23
SP - 552
EP - 562
JO - IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics
JF - IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics
IS - 2
ER -