Power and domination

Steven Lukes

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The ‘power debate’ raises hard questions to which the recent ‘domination debate’ among philosophers embracing neorepublicanism contributes. Concerning agents and structures, the neorepublican focus on dominators’ wills needs broadening, replacing intentions with interests, since their power can be routine and unconsidered, and extend across generations. Neorepublicans see domination as a potential rendering others vulnerable; here the view needs to be narrowed to specify which potential dangers are relevant. There is no convincing way of determining what counts as dominating power that does not derive from one or another moral and political standpoint. These hard questions are and must remain open.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)97-108
    Number of pages12
    JournalJournal of Political Power
    Volume14
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2021

    Keywords

    • Domination
    • agent
    • exercise
    • potential
    • structure

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Power and domination'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this