TY - JOUR
T1 - Power Day
T2 - Addressing the Use and Abuse of Power in Medical Training
AU - Angoff, Nancy R.
AU - Duncan, Laura
AU - Roxas, Nichole
AU - Hansen, Helena
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors wish to thank Ann Williams, Linda Honan, Richard Belitsky, Janet Hafler, and Eve Colson. This work was supported in part by NIH DA032674 (awarded to H. Hansen).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pty Ltd.
PY - 2016/6/1
Y1 - 2016/6/1
N2 - Problem: Medical student mistreatment, as well as patient and staff mistreatment by all levels of medical trainees and faculty, is still prevalent in U.S. clinical training. Largely missing in interventions to reduce mistreatment is acknowledgement of the abuse of power produced by the hierarchical structure in which medicine is practiced. Approach: Beginning in 2001, Yale School of Medicine has held annual “Power Day” workshops for third year medical students and advanced practice nursing students, to define and analyse power dynamics within the medical hierarchy and hidden curriculum using literature, guest speakers, and small groups. During rotations, medical students write narratives about the use of power witnessed in the wards. In response to student and small group leader feedback, workshop organizers have developed additional activities related to examining and changing the use of power in clinical teams. Outcome: Emerging narrative themes included the potential impact of small acts and students feeling “mute” and “complicit” in morally distressing situations. Small groups provided safe spaces for advice, support, and professional identity formation. By 2005, students recognized residents that used power positively with Power Day awards and alumni served as keynote speakers on the use of power in medicine. By 2010, departments including OB/GYN, surgery, psychiatry, and paediatrics, had added weekly team Power Hour discussions. Next Steps: The authors highlight barriers, benefits, and lessons learned. Barriers include the notion of clinical irrelevance and resistance to the word “power” due to perceived accusation of abuse. Benefits include promoting open dialogue about power, fostering inter-professional collaboration, rewarding positive role modelling by residents and faculty, and creating a network of trainee empowerment and leadership. Furthermore, faculty have started to ask that issues of power be addressed in a more transparent way at their level of the hierarchy as well.
AB - Problem: Medical student mistreatment, as well as patient and staff mistreatment by all levels of medical trainees and faculty, is still prevalent in U.S. clinical training. Largely missing in interventions to reduce mistreatment is acknowledgement of the abuse of power produced by the hierarchical structure in which medicine is practiced. Approach: Beginning in 2001, Yale School of Medicine has held annual “Power Day” workshops for third year medical students and advanced practice nursing students, to define and analyse power dynamics within the medical hierarchy and hidden curriculum using literature, guest speakers, and small groups. During rotations, medical students write narratives about the use of power witnessed in the wards. In response to student and small group leader feedback, workshop organizers have developed additional activities related to examining and changing the use of power in clinical teams. Outcome: Emerging narrative themes included the potential impact of small acts and students feeling “mute” and “complicit” in morally distressing situations. Small groups provided safe spaces for advice, support, and professional identity formation. By 2005, students recognized residents that used power positively with Power Day awards and alumni served as keynote speakers on the use of power in medicine. By 2010, departments including OB/GYN, surgery, psychiatry, and paediatrics, had added weekly team Power Hour discussions. Next Steps: The authors highlight barriers, benefits, and lessons learned. Barriers include the notion of clinical irrelevance and resistance to the word “power” due to perceived accusation of abuse. Benefits include promoting open dialogue about power, fostering inter-professional collaboration, rewarding positive role modelling by residents and faculty, and creating a network of trainee empowerment and leadership. Furthermore, faculty have started to ask that issues of power be addressed in a more transparent way at their level of the hierarchy as well.
KW - Hierarchy
KW - Inter-professional education
KW - Medical education
KW - Medical training
KW - Mistreatment
KW - Power
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961156819&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961156819&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11673-016-9714-4
DO - 10.1007/s11673-016-9714-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 26979827
AN - SCOPUS:84961156819
SN - 1176-7529
VL - 13
SP - 203
EP - 213
JO - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
JF - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
IS - 2
ER -