TY - GEN
T1 - Practical scalability of wavelength routing switches
AU - Rodelgo-Lacruz, M.
AU - López-Bravo, C.
AU - González-Castaño, F. J.
AU - Chao, H. Jonathan
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - Packet switches with optical fabrics can potentially scale to higher capacities. It is also potentially possible to improve their reliability, and reduce both their footprint and power consumption. A well-known alternative for implementing hardwired switches is Arrayed Waveguide Grating (AWG). Ideally, AWG insertion losses do not depend on the number of input-output ports, meaning that scalability is theoretically infinite. However, accurate second-order assessment has demonstrated that in-band crosstalk exponentially increases the power penalty, limiting the realistic useful size of AWG commercial devices to about 10-15 ports (13-18 dB) [1]. On the other hand, the in-band crosstalk at AWG outputs depends on the connection pattern set by the scheduling algorithm and this port count limitation is calculated for worst-case scenarios. In this paper, we show that distributed schedulers with predetermined connection patterns can be used to avoid these harmful arrangements. We also show that the probability of worst-case patterns is very low, allowing us to set a more realistic port limit for general centralized schedulers and very small losses. With these results, we calculate more realistic port count limits for both scheduler types.
AB - Packet switches with optical fabrics can potentially scale to higher capacities. It is also potentially possible to improve their reliability, and reduce both their footprint and power consumption. A well-known alternative for implementing hardwired switches is Arrayed Waveguide Grating (AWG). Ideally, AWG insertion losses do not depend on the number of input-output ports, meaning that scalability is theoretically infinite. However, accurate second-order assessment has demonstrated that in-band crosstalk exponentially increases the power penalty, limiting the realistic useful size of AWG commercial devices to about 10-15 ports (13-18 dB) [1]. On the other hand, the in-band crosstalk at AWG outputs depends on the connection pattern set by the scheduling algorithm and this port count limitation is calculated for worst-case scenarios. In this paper, we show that distributed schedulers with predetermined connection patterns can be used to avoid these harmful arrangements. We also show that the probability of worst-case patterns is very low, allowing us to set a more realistic port limit for general centralized schedulers and very small losses. With these results, we calculate more realistic port count limits for both scheduler types.
KW - AWG
KW - Crosstalk
KW - Optical packet switching
KW - Scalability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70449509842&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70449509842&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ICC.2009.5199357
DO - 10.1109/ICC.2009.5199357
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:70449509842
SN - 9781424434350
T3 - IEEE International Conference on Communications
BT - Proceedings - 2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2009
T2 - 2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2009
Y2 - 14 June 2009 through 18 June 2009
ER -