TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting Features for Members of Natural Categories When Categorization Is Uncertain
AU - Malt, Barbara C.
AU - Ross, Brian H.
AU - Murphy, Gregory L.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1995/5
Y1 - 1995/5
N2 - An important function of concepts is to allow the prediction of unseen features. A Bayesian account of feature prediction suggests that people will consider all the categories an object could belong to when they judge the likelihood that the object has a feature. The judgment and decision literature suggests that they may instead use a simpler heuristic in which they consider only the most likely category. In 3 experiments, no evidence was found that participants took into account alternative categories as well as the most likely one when they judged feature probabilities for familiar objects in meaningful contexts. These results, in conjunction with those of Murphy and Ross (1994), suggest that although people may consider alternative categories in certain limited situations, they often do not. Reasons for why the use of alternative categories may be relatively rare are discussed, and conditions under which people may take alternative categories into account are outlined.
AB - An important function of concepts is to allow the prediction of unseen features. A Bayesian account of feature prediction suggests that people will consider all the categories an object could belong to when they judge the likelihood that the object has a feature. The judgment and decision literature suggests that they may instead use a simpler heuristic in which they consider only the most likely category. In 3 experiments, no evidence was found that participants took into account alternative categories as well as the most likely one when they judged feature probabilities for familiar objects in meaningful contexts. These results, in conjunction with those of Murphy and Ross (1994), suggest that although people may consider alternative categories in certain limited situations, they often do not. Reasons for why the use of alternative categories may be relatively rare are discussed, and conditions under which people may take alternative categories into account are outlined.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029298420&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029298420&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/0278-7393.21.3.646
DO - 10.1037/0278-7393.21.3.646
M3 - Article
C2 - 7602266
AN - SCOPUS:0029298420
SN - 0278-7393
VL - 21
SP - 646
EP - 661
JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
IS - 3
ER -