Predictors of study dropout in cognitive-behavioural therapy with a trauma focus for post-traumatic stress disorder in adults: An individual participant data meta-analysis

Simonne Wright, Eirini Karyotaki, Pim Cuijpers, Jonathan Bisson, Davide Papola, Anke B. Witteveen, Sudie E. Back, Dana Bichescu-Burian, Liuva Capezzani, Marylene Cloitre, Grant J. Devilly, Thomas Elbert, Marcelo Mello, Julian D. Ford, Damion Grasso, Pedro Gamito, Richard Gray, Moira Haller, Nigel Hunt, Rolf J. KleberJulia König, Claire Kullack, Jonathan Laugharne, Rachel Liebman, Christopher William Lee, Jeannette Lely, John C. Markowitz, Candice Monson, Mirjam J. Nijdam, Sonya B. Norman, Miranda Olff, Tahereh Mina Orang, Luca Ostacoli, Nenad Paunovic, Eva Petkova, Patricia Resick, Rita Rosner, Maggie Schauer, Joy M. Schmitz, Ulrich Schnyder, Brian N. Smith, Anka A. Vujanovic, Yinyin Zang, Érica Panzani Duran, Francisco Lotufo Neto, Soraya Seedat, Marit Sijbrandij

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background Available empirical evidence on participant-level factors associated with dropout from psychotherapies for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is both limited and inconclusive. More comprehensive understanding of the various factors that contribute to study dropout from cognitive-behavioural therapy with a trauma focus (CBT-TF) is crucial for enhancing treatment outcomes. Objective Using an individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) design, we examined participant-level predictors of study dropout from CBT-TF interventions for PTSD. Methods A comprehensive systematic literature search was undertaken to identify randomised controlled trials comparing CBT-TF with waitlist control, treatment-as-usual or another therapy. Academic databases were screened from conception until 11 January 2021. Eligible interventions were required to be individual and in-person delivered. Participants were considered dropouts if they did not complete the post-treatment assessment. Findings The systematic literature search identified 81 eligible studies (n=3330). Data were pooled from 25 available CBT-TF studies comprising 823 participants. Overall, 221 (27%) of the 823 dropped out. Of 581 civilians, 133 (23%) dropped out, as did 75 (42%) of 178 military personnel/veterans. Bivariate and multivariate analyses indicated that military personnel/veterans (RR 2.37) had a significantly greater risk of dropout than civilians. Furthermore, the chance of dropping out significantly decreased with advancing age (continuous; RR 0.98). Conclusions These findings underscore the risk of premature termination from CBT-TF among younger adults and military veterans/personnel. Clinical implication Understanding predictors can inform the development of retention strategies tailored to at-risk subgroups, enhance engagement, improve adherence and yield better treatment outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere301159
JournalBMJ Mental Health
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 13 2024

Keywords

  • PSYCHIATRY

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predictors of study dropout in cognitive-behavioural therapy with a trauma focus for post-traumatic stress disorder in adults: An individual participant data meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this