Abstract
The tendency for people to consider themselves morally good while behaving selfishly is known as moral hypocrisy. Influential work by Valdesolo and DeSteno (2007) found evidence for intergroup moral hypocrisy such that people were more forgiving of transgressions when they were committed by an in-group member than an out-group member. We conducted two experiments to examine moral hypocrisy and group membership in an online paradigm with Prolific workers from the United States: a direct replication of the original work with minimal groups (N = 610; nationally representative) and a conceptual replication with political groups (N = 606; 50% Democrats and 50% Republicans). Although the results did not replicate the original findings, we observed evidence of in-group favoritism in minimal groups and out-group derogation in political groups. The current research finds mixed evidence of intergroup moral hypocrisy and has implications for understanding the contextual dependencies of intergroup bias and partisanship.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 798-813 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Psychological Science |
Volume | 35 |
Issue number | 7 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jul 2024 |
Keywords
- groups
- identity
- minimal groups
- morality
- open data
- partisanship
- preregistration
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Psychology