TY - JOUR
T1 - Preschoolers Use Social Allegiances to Predict Behavior
AU - Chalik, Lisa
AU - Rhodes, Marjorie
N1 - Funding Information:
We are very grateful to the parents, children, and teachers at the preschools that participated in this research and to the families and staff at the Children’s Museum of Manhattan. We are also grateful to Kelli Grobe and Joe Dietzel for assisting with data collection and to Karl Edwards for the study illustrations. Funding for this research was provided to Rhodes by National Science Foundation grant BCS-1226942.
PY - 2014/1
Y1 - 2014/1
N2 - Developing mechanisms for predicting human action is a critical task of early conceptual development. Three studies examined whether 4-year-old children (N = 149) use social allegiances to predict behavior, by testing whether they expect the experiences of social partners to influence individual action. After being exposed to a conflict between two individuals from different novel social categories, children reliably predicted that another member of one category would withhold friendship from the contrasting category (Studies 1 and 2) and direct harmful actions toward the contrasting category (Study 3). Children did so even when the initial conflict had no direct implications for the other category members, and even when they knew that the two social categories had a positive relationship in the past. These data show that young children view social categories as marking people who are obligated to one another, and thus use the experiences of allegiance partners to predict how individuals will behave. [Supplementary materials are available for this article. Visit the publisher's online edition of Journal of Cognition and Development for the following free supplemental resource(s): Appendices.].
AB - Developing mechanisms for predicting human action is a critical task of early conceptual development. Three studies examined whether 4-year-old children (N = 149) use social allegiances to predict behavior, by testing whether they expect the experiences of social partners to influence individual action. After being exposed to a conflict between two individuals from different novel social categories, children reliably predicted that another member of one category would withhold friendship from the contrasting category (Studies 1 and 2) and direct harmful actions toward the contrasting category (Study 3). Children did so even when the initial conflict had no direct implications for the other category members, and even when they knew that the two social categories had a positive relationship in the past. These data show that young children view social categories as marking people who are obligated to one another, and thus use the experiences of allegiance partners to predict how individuals will behave. [Supplementary materials are available for this article. Visit the publisher's online edition of Journal of Cognition and Development for the following free supplemental resource(s): Appendices.].
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893814617&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893814617&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15248372.2012.728546
DO - 10.1080/15248372.2012.728546
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84893814617
SN - 1524-8372
VL - 15
SP - 136
EP - 160
JO - Journal of Cognition and Development
JF - Journal of Cognition and Development
IS - 1
ER -