Program Recertification Costs: Evidence from SNAP†

Tatiana Homonoff, Jason Somerville

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Participants in means-tested programs must periodically document eligibility through a recertification process. If all cases that fail recertification are ineligible, the exact timing of this process should be irrelevant. We find that later recertification interview assignments for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which leave less time to reschedule missed interviews, decrease recertification success by 22 percent. The consequences of not recertifying due to later interviews are highly skewed: most cases quickly reenroll, while one-quarter remain off SNAP for over a year. The marginal disenrolled case is as needy as the average participant, suggesting inefficient screening from late interviews.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)271-298
Number of pages28
JournalAmerican Economic Journal: Economic Policy
Issue number4
StatePublished - Nov 2021

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'Program Recertification Costs: Evidence from SNAP†'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this