Prostate cancer: Diffusion-weighted imaging versus dynamic-contrast enhanced imaging for tumor localization -a meta-analysis

Mohammad Haghighi, Shivam Shah, Samir S. Taneja, Andrew B. Rosenkrantz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging for prostate cancer (PCa) detection by performing a meta-analysis of studies evaluating these techniques within the same patient cohort. METHODS: Evidence-based online databases were searched for studies reporting the performance of DWI and DCE in PCa detection in the same patient cohorts using histopathology as reference standard and providing sufficient data to construct 2 × 2 contingency tables. Pooled estimates of diagnostic performance were computed across included studies. RESULTS: Of 80 initial studies identified, 5 studies (total of 265 patients and 1730 prostatic regions) met criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Pooled sensitivity was 58.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53.5%-63.1%) for DWI and 55.3% (95% CI, 50.4%-60.1%) for DCE. Pooled specificity was 89.0% (95% CI, 87.2%-0.7%) for DWI and 87.9% (95% CI, 86.0%-89.6%) for DCE. At summary receiver-operating-characteristic analysis, area-under-the-curve was 0.810 (0.059) for DWI and 0.786 (0.079) for DCE. Heterogeneity across studies was high for sensitivity and specificity [inconsistency index (I), >90%], although heterogeneity of specificity was substantially improved after excluding an outlier study in terms of diagnostic threshold (I = 0.0%-68.8%). Relative performance of DWI and DCE remained similar after this exclusion CONCLUSIONS: There was a paucity of studies comparing DWI and DCE in the same patient cohorts, and heterogeneity among these studies was substantial. Nevertheless, performance of DWI and DCE was similar across identified studies, with both techniques showing substantially better specificity than sensitivity. Larger studies with uniform methodology are warranted to further understand relative merits of the 2 techniques.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)980-988
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography
Issue number6
StatePublished - 2013


  • MRI
  • diffusion-weighted imaging
  • dynamic contrast-enhanced
  • meta-analysis
  • prostate cancer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging


Dive into the research topics of 'Prostate cancer: Diffusion-weighted imaging versus dynamic-contrast enhanced imaging for tumor localization -a meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this