TY - JOUR
T1 - Proximal Outcomes Matter
T2 - A Multilevel Examination of the Processes by Which Coordinating Councils Produce Change
AU - Javdani, Shabnam
AU - Allen, Nicole E.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Vernie Beor-krem, Heather Dorsey, Sally Foster, and council coordinators and members for helping make this study possible. This project was supported by funding from the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) Grant Award #: 2005-WG-BX-0005. The content of this article reflects the views of the authors and not necessarily those of the funding agency.
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - Communities are engaged in efforts to create a coordinated response to intimate partner violence. Though coordinating councils are commonly employed vehicles for such efforts, research provides only equivocal support regarding their effectiveness. These mixed findings may reflect methodological and conceptual challenges. Specifically, there is an over-reliance on conceptualizing council effectiveness in terms of distal outcomes (e.g., behavior change), rather than the intermediary processes by which councils affect change. A direct assessment of councils' proximal outcomes may highlight change mechanisms. To that end, this study investigates the extent to which councils impact proximal outcomes and examines the processes through which proximal outcomes are interrelated and linked to distal community change. Study findings suggest that perceived proximal outcomes do significantly predict variability in perceived distal community change across councils. Specifically, promotion of social capital and institutionalized change predict achievement of distal community change, and promotion of social capital also predicts achievement of institutionalized change.
AB - Communities are engaged in efforts to create a coordinated response to intimate partner violence. Though coordinating councils are commonly employed vehicles for such efforts, research provides only equivocal support regarding their effectiveness. These mixed findings may reflect methodological and conceptual challenges. Specifically, there is an over-reliance on conceptualizing council effectiveness in terms of distal outcomes (e.g., behavior change), rather than the intermediary processes by which councils affect change. A direct assessment of councils' proximal outcomes may highlight change mechanisms. To that end, this study investigates the extent to which councils impact proximal outcomes and examines the processes through which proximal outcomes are interrelated and linked to distal community change. Study findings suggest that perceived proximal outcomes do significantly predict variability in perceived distal community change across councils. Specifically, promotion of social capital and institutionalized change predict achievement of distal community change, and promotion of social capital also predicts achievement of institutionalized change.
KW - Coalitions
KW - Collaboration
KW - Coordinated community response
KW - Coordinating councils
KW - Council effectiveness
KW - Council processes
KW - Domestic violence
KW - Intermediate outcomes
KW - Intimate partner violence
KW - Social capital
KW - Systems change
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650984250&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650984250&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10464-010-9375-0
DO - 10.1007/s10464-010-9375-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 21052823
AN - SCOPUS:78650984250
SN - 0091-0562
VL - 47
SP - 12
EP - 27
JO - American journal of community psychology
JF - American journal of community psychology
IS - 1
ER -