Abstract
Currently, little information is available to guide health care practitioners on how to facilitate positive outcomes in individuals who develop new-onset diabetes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo HSCT) for treatment of hematological cancers. Results from this constructivist grounded theory study provide a theoretical framework explaining the psychosocial process of change that middle-age and older adults experience when developing new-onset diabetes in this context. Two predominant factors influenced this change: treatment burden and perception of diabetes. Key findings were that participants with ongoing complications, primarily graft-versus-host disease, experienced a high degree of treatment-related burden and unclear perceptions of diabetes when compared with those with no or few post-allo-HSCT complications. These factors limited their capacity to positively respond to and self-manage their condition. Implications for practice are to thoroughly consider these two factors when developing patient-centered interventions for middle-age and older adults with new-onset diabetes after allo HSCT.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1816-1827 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Qualitative Health Research |
Volume | 27 |
Issue number | 12 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 1 2017 |
Keywords
- United States
- allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
- cancer
- chronic illness and disease, experiences
- diabetes
- grounded theory, constructivist
- middle age
- older people
- qualitative
- research
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health