TY - JOUR
T1 - Public key trace and revoke scheme secure against adaptive chosen ciphertext attack
AU - Dodis, Yevgeniy
AU - Fazio, Nelly
PY - 2003
Y1 - 2003
N2 - A (public key) Trace and Revoke Scheme combines the functionality of broadcast encryption with the capability of traitor tracing. Specifically, (1) a trusted center publishes a single public key and distributes individual secret keys to the users of the system; (2) anybody can encrypt a message so that all but a specified subset of "revoked" users can decrypt the resulting cipher text; and (3) if a (small) group of users combine their secret keys to produce a "pirate decoder", the center can trace at least one of the "traitors" given access to this decoder. We construct the first chosen ciphertext (CCA2) secure Trace and Revoke Scheme based on the DDH assumption. Our scheme is also the first adoptively secure scheme, allowing the adversary to corrupt players at any point during execution, while prior works (e.g., [14, 16]) only achieves a very weak form of non-adaptive security even against chosen plaintext attacks. Of independent interest, we present a slightly simpler construction that shows a "natural separation" between the classical notion of CCA2-security and the recently proposed [15, 1] relaxed notion of gCCA2-security.
AB - A (public key) Trace and Revoke Scheme combines the functionality of broadcast encryption with the capability of traitor tracing. Specifically, (1) a trusted center publishes a single public key and distributes individual secret keys to the users of the system; (2) anybody can encrypt a message so that all but a specified subset of "revoked" users can decrypt the resulting cipher text; and (3) if a (small) group of users combine their secret keys to produce a "pirate decoder", the center can trace at least one of the "traitors" given access to this decoder. We construct the first chosen ciphertext (CCA2) secure Trace and Revoke Scheme based on the DDH assumption. Our scheme is also the first adoptively secure scheme, allowing the adversary to corrupt players at any point during execution, while prior works (e.g., [14, 16]) only achieves a very weak form of non-adaptive security even against chosen plaintext attacks. Of independent interest, we present a slightly simpler construction that shows a "natural separation" between the classical notion of CCA2-security and the recently proposed [15, 1] relaxed notion of gCCA2-security.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35248899841&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35248899841&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/3-540-36288-6_8
DO - 10.1007/3-540-36288-6_8
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:35248899841
SN - 0302-9743
VL - 2567
SP - 100
EP - 115
JO - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
JF - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
ER -