TY - JOUR
T1 - Pulling punches
T2 - Congressional constraints on the Supreme Court's constitutional rulings, 1987-2000
AU - Harvey, Anna
AU - Friedman, Barry
PY - 2006/11
Y1 - 2006/11
N2 - To date, no study has found evidence that the U.S. Supreme Court is constrained by Congress in its constitutional decisions. We addressed the selection bias inherent in previous studies with a statute-centered, rather than a case-centered, analysis, following all congressional laws enacted between 1987 and 2000. We uncovered considerable congressional constraint in the Court's constitutional rulings. In particular, we found that the probability that the Rehnquist Court would strike a liberal congressional law rose between 47% and 288% as a result of the 1994 congressional elections, depending on the legislative model used.
AB - To date, no study has found evidence that the U.S. Supreme Court is constrained by Congress in its constitutional decisions. We addressed the selection bias inherent in previous studies with a statute-centered, rather than a case-centered, analysis, following all congressional laws enacted between 1987 and 2000. We uncovered considerable congressional constraint in the Court's constitutional rulings. In particular, we found that the probability that the Rehnquist Court would strike a liberal congressional law rose between 47% and 288% as a result of the 1994 congressional elections, depending on the legislative model used.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947422048&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33947422048&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3162/036298006X201922
DO - 10.3162/036298006X201922
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:33947422048
SN - 0362-9805
VL - 31
SP - 533
EP - 562
JO - Legislative Studies Quarterly
JF - Legislative Studies Quarterly
IS - 4
ER -