Racial Disparities in Cesarean Delivery Rates: Do Hospital-Level Factors Matter?

E. Nicole Teal, Rebecca J. Baer, Laura Jelliffe-Pawlowski, Biftu Mengesha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to assess whether racial disparities in nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex cesarean delivery rates vary among hospitals of different type (academic vs. nonacademic), setting (urban vs. rural), delivery volume, and patient population. Study Design This is a retrospective cohort study including singleton term vertex live births in nulliparous Black and non-Hispanic White birthing people in California between 2011 and 2017. Cesarean delivery rates were obtained using birth certificate data and International Classification of Diseases, 9th/10th Revision codes. Risk of cesarean delivery was compared among Black versus White birthing people by hospital type (academic, nonacademic), setting (rural, suburban, urban), volume (< 1,200, 1,200-2,300, 2,400-3,599, ≥3,600 deliveries annually), and patient population (proportion Black-serving). Federal Information Processing codes were used to designate hospital setting. Risks were calculated using univariable and multivariable logistic regression and adjusted for birthing person age, body mass index, medical comorbidities, gestational age, labor type (spontaneous vs. induction), and infant birthweight. Results The sample included 59,441 Black (cesarean delivery rate: 30.2%) and 363,624 White birthing people (cesarean delivery rate: 26.1%). Black birthing people were significantly more likely than White birthing people to have a cesarean delivery across nearly all hospital-level factors considered with adjusted relative risks ranging from 1.1 to 1.3. The only exception was rural settings in which the adjusted relative risk was 1.3 but did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion Black-White disparities in nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex cesarean delivery rates were persistent across all hospital-level factors we considered: academic status, rurality, delivery volume, and patient population. Furthermore, disparities existed at roughly the same magnitude regardless of hospital characteristics. These global increased risks likely reflect structural inequities in care, which contribute to disparities in pregnancy-related morbidity and mortality. These data should encourage providers, hospital systems, and quality collaboratives to further investigate racial disparities in cesarean delivery rates and develop strategies for eliminating them. Key Points Nulliparous Black birthing people are more likely than White to undergo cesarean delivery. This persists across hospitals of all academic status, rurality, delivery volume, and patient population. These findings likely reflect structural rather than institutional inequities in obstetric care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)375-382
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Perinatology
Volume41
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 29 2022

Keywords

  • academic hospitals
  • black serving
  • Black-White disparities
  • cesarean section
  • delivery volume
  • hospital characteristics
  • rurality
  • structural inequity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Racial Disparities in Cesarean Delivery Rates: Do Hospital-Level Factors Matter?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this