Racial presence versus racial justice: The affective power of an aesthetic condition

Cristina Beltrán

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


    In the realm of electoral politics, a growing number of women, African Americans, and Latinos now serve at the highest levels of government. For many Americans, the bipartisan presence of representatives who are people of color and/or women is proof that we live in a post-feminist and postracial era in which institutions are now fundamentally fair and accessible. Rather than assuming that racial presence is synonymous with racial justice, this essay turns to aesthetic theory to advocate for a new understanding of presence-not as proof that racial or gender justice has been achieved but as a kind of beauty that is experienced as a form of visible certitude. Drawing on the work of Hannah Pitkin, alongside writings on descriptive representation for Latinos and African Americans, this essay stresses the importance of judgment, arguing that on questions of social justice, a racially diverse elite is simultaneously ethically valuable and politically indeterminate.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)137-158
    Number of pages22
    JournalDu Bois Review
    Issue number1
    StatePublished - 2014


    • Aesthetics
    • African Americans
    • Judgment
    • Latinos
    • Postracial
    • Representation

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Cultural Studies
    • Anthropology
    • Sociology and Political Science


    Dive into the research topics of 'Racial presence versus racial justice: The affective power of an aesthetic condition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this