TY - JOUR
T1 - Reactions vs. Reality
T2 - Using Sentiment Analysis to Measure University Students’ Responses to Learning ArcGIS
AU - Hixson, Taylor
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©, Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. ©, © 2020 The Author(s).
PY - 2019/9/2
Y1 - 2019/9/2
N2 - As data literacy competencies become more common in university-level curriculum, understanding how students are really feeling when they first encounter new software and data concepts is of increasing importance to student success. Using sentiment analysis, this article seeks to understand some of those students’ reactions, or sentiments, to using ArcGIS and geospatial data in a university classroom environment and how those reactions evolve as more experience is gained. Over the course of three weeks and six workshops, a librarian taught students how to use ArcGIS in order for them to complete course assignments. Each week the librarian provided a form that included two free-text response questions. The VADER sentiment analysis tool was applied to all text responses, rating each response with a compound score on a scale between +1 (positive sentiment) and –1 (negative sentiment). The analysis showed that the range of respondent sentiment narrowed throughout the three weeks. Voyant Tools, an online tool for quick text analysis, was also used to count the unique and frequently used words in the survey’s two free-text questions.
AB - As data literacy competencies become more common in university-level curriculum, understanding how students are really feeling when they first encounter new software and data concepts is of increasing importance to student success. Using sentiment analysis, this article seeks to understand some of those students’ reactions, or sentiments, to using ArcGIS and geospatial data in a university classroom environment and how those reactions evolve as more experience is gained. Over the course of three weeks and six workshops, a librarian taught students how to use ArcGIS in order for them to complete course assignments. Each week the librarian provided a form that included two free-text response questions. The VADER sentiment analysis tool was applied to all text responses, rating each response with a compound score on a scale between +1 (positive sentiment) and –1 (negative sentiment). The analysis showed that the range of respondent sentiment narrowed throughout the three weeks. Voyant Tools, an online tool for quick text analysis, was also used to count the unique and frequently used words in the survey’s two free-text questions.
KW - ArcGIS
KW - Instruction
KW - sentiment analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85080103367&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85080103367&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15420353.2020.1719266
DO - 10.1080/15420353.2020.1719266
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85080103367
SN - 1542-0353
VL - 15
SP - 263
EP - 276
JO - Journal of Map and Geography Libraries
JF - Journal of Map and Geography Libraries
IS - 2-3
ER -