TY - JOUR
T1 - Reconciling molecular systematics and traditional taxonomy in a species-rich clade of sea stars (Leptasterias subgenus Hexasterias)
AU - Flowers, J. M.
AU - Foltz, D. W.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements We thank A.W. Hrincevich for kindly sharing the data presented in Fig. 1 and for collecting the specimens analyzed from Kanaga Island, V. Wilson and D. Taranik for technical assistance, and J.C. Larkin for the use of his laboratory for molecular work on museum specimens. We thank R.J. Mooi and C. Mah at the California Academy of Sciences and D.L. Pawson and C. Ahearn at the National Museum of Natural History for hosting us at their respective institutions and for opening to us the Leptasterias collections for morphological and molecular analysis. We thank S.W. Herke and A. Rocha-Olivares for advice on data analysis and presentation, and we thank M.E. Hellberg, M.A.F. Noor, D.P. Prowell, C.S. Willett, N. Knowlton, S.E. Ratner, S.A. Lourie, and two anonymous reviewers for comments and suggestions on earlier drafts. Finally, we thank M.T. Bolton and M.M. Coenen for laboratory and technical assistance. Partial support for this research was provided by NSF grant OPP9707806 to D.W. Foltz. A National Geographic Society grant to W.B. Stickle facilitated collection of many of the specimens analyzed.
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - Recent or incomplete speciation events can often lead to conflicting patterns of genetic and morphological variation, due to a combination of hybridization, incomplete lineage sorting and limited morphological divergence among genetically distinct species. This situation complicates the reconciliation of molecular systematic results with morphology-based taxonomy. For example, six-rayed sea stars of the genus Leptasterias have been the subject of considerable taxonomic controversy. Prior molecular studies established that Leptasterias subgenus Hexasterias consists of several genetically discrete clades, but extensive morphological variability has prevented the application of formal taxonomic nomenclature to these groups. In the present study, molecular and morphological approaches were combined to reconcile, where possible, the traditional taxonomy of Fisher (1930: US Nat Mus Bull 76:1-356) with recent molecular systematic results. Partial mitochondrial DNA control region sequences were collected from 29 Fisher-identified museum specimens representing seven nominal species of Leptasterias subgenus Hexasterias, to establish the relationship between traditional taxa and molecular lineages. Additional DNA sequences were obtained from 52 recently collected individuals representing the L. aleutica (Fisher, 1930)/L. camtschatica (Brandt, 1835) complex; these sea stars were collected on Kanaga Island, Alaska, in August 1997. Morphological data were collected for 227 museum specimens collected before 1930, and 309 specimens collected between 1988 and 1998 from locations in the eastern North Pacific. The analyses indicate that three nominal species within the Camtschatica section of subgenus Hexasterias, L. alaskensis (Verrill, 1914), L. hexactis (Stimpson, 1862), and L. leptodoma (Fisher, 1930), correspond to separate major clades of a molecular phylogeny, permitting the re-description of these taxa using molecular characters. Extensive sharing of mitochondrial DNA sequences by L. aleutica and L. camtschatica suggests recent genetic divergence of these two species and possible incomplete lineage sorting or frequent hybridization. The lack of diagnostic molecular differences between these two nominal species means that they are currently identifiable only by morphological criteria. Determining the status of three other nominal species, L. aequalis (Stimpson, 1862), L. asteira (Fisher, 1930) and L. pusilla (Fisher, 1930) will require additional molecular and morphological data.
AB - Recent or incomplete speciation events can often lead to conflicting patterns of genetic and morphological variation, due to a combination of hybridization, incomplete lineage sorting and limited morphological divergence among genetically distinct species. This situation complicates the reconciliation of molecular systematic results with morphology-based taxonomy. For example, six-rayed sea stars of the genus Leptasterias have been the subject of considerable taxonomic controversy. Prior molecular studies established that Leptasterias subgenus Hexasterias consists of several genetically discrete clades, but extensive morphological variability has prevented the application of formal taxonomic nomenclature to these groups. In the present study, molecular and morphological approaches were combined to reconcile, where possible, the traditional taxonomy of Fisher (1930: US Nat Mus Bull 76:1-356) with recent molecular systematic results. Partial mitochondrial DNA control region sequences were collected from 29 Fisher-identified museum specimens representing seven nominal species of Leptasterias subgenus Hexasterias, to establish the relationship between traditional taxa and molecular lineages. Additional DNA sequences were obtained from 52 recently collected individuals representing the L. aleutica (Fisher, 1930)/L. camtschatica (Brandt, 1835) complex; these sea stars were collected on Kanaga Island, Alaska, in August 1997. Morphological data were collected for 227 museum specimens collected before 1930, and 309 specimens collected between 1988 and 1998 from locations in the eastern North Pacific. The analyses indicate that three nominal species within the Camtschatica section of subgenus Hexasterias, L. alaskensis (Verrill, 1914), L. hexactis (Stimpson, 1862), and L. leptodoma (Fisher, 1930), correspond to separate major clades of a molecular phylogeny, permitting the re-description of these taxa using molecular characters. Extensive sharing of mitochondrial DNA sequences by L. aleutica and L. camtschatica suggests recent genetic divergence of these two species and possible incomplete lineage sorting or frequent hybridization. The lack of diagnostic molecular differences between these two nominal species means that they are currently identifiable only by morphological criteria. Determining the status of three other nominal species, L. aequalis (Stimpson, 1862), L. asteira (Fisher, 1930) and L. pusilla (Fisher, 1930) will require additional molecular and morphological data.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034814002&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034814002&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s002270100595
DO - 10.1007/s002270100595
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0034814002
SN - 0025-3162
VL - 139
SP - 475
EP - 483
JO - Marine Biology
JF - Marine Biology
IS - 3
ER -