TY - JOUR
T1 - Reconsolidation
T2 - The samsara of memory consolidation
AU - Alberini, Cristina M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments Many thanks to all the members of my lab for their invaluable contribution to the work discussed and for their helpful feedbacks on the manuscript, and to Dr. Reginald Miller and the CCMS facility of Mount Sinai for technical support. The work included in this review was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH65635), National Institute of Drugs of Abuse (R21 CEBRA DA017672), and the Hirschl Foundation to CMA.
PY - 2007/3
Y1 - 2007/3
N2 - Memory formation is a complex and very dynamic process. After a learning event, the acquired information undergoes a number of changes that eventually result in memory storage. Stored memories are very malleable. Recent rediscoveries show that after reactivation, for example by retrieval, an established memory can become transiently sensitive to disruption and needs to undergo a process of restabilization, known as reconsolidation, to be maintained. The findings that stabilized memories can become labile have challenged the classical view of how memories are consolidated over time and stored. On the other hand, the reconsolidation process is not fully understood, and theories about the nature and function of memory reconsolidation remain controversial. In this paper, I will present my view on some of the controversial issues of memory reconsolidation and propose a hypothetical model for how this process contributes to memory stabilization. The debated issues that will be discussed are: (1) The term reconsolidation; (2) Temporal constraints of memory reconsolidation; (3) Classical theory of memory consolidation versus theory of memory reconsolidation; (4) Procedural constraints: what is it that needs to be reactivated to produce memory fragility? (5) Functions of memory reconsolidation; (6) Disrupting reconsolidation: an impairment of memory stabilization or retrieval?
AB - Memory formation is a complex and very dynamic process. After a learning event, the acquired information undergoes a number of changes that eventually result in memory storage. Stored memories are very malleable. Recent rediscoveries show that after reactivation, for example by retrieval, an established memory can become transiently sensitive to disruption and needs to undergo a process of restabilization, known as reconsolidation, to be maintained. The findings that stabilized memories can become labile have challenged the classical view of how memories are consolidated over time and stored. On the other hand, the reconsolidation process is not fully understood, and theories about the nature and function of memory reconsolidation remain controversial. In this paper, I will present my view on some of the controversial issues of memory reconsolidation and propose a hypothetical model for how this process contributes to memory stabilization. The debated issues that will be discussed are: (1) The term reconsolidation; (2) Temporal constraints of memory reconsolidation; (3) Classical theory of memory consolidation versus theory of memory reconsolidation; (4) Procedural constraints: what is it that needs to be reactivated to produce memory fragility? (5) Functions of memory reconsolidation; (6) Disrupting reconsolidation: an impairment of memory stabilization or retrieval?
KW - Amnesia
KW - Consolidation
KW - Memory
KW - Protein synthesis inhibitors
KW - Reconsolidation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250782201&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250782201&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11559-007-9000-z
DO - 10.1007/s11559-007-9000-z
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:34250782201
SN - 1559-8314
VL - 1
SP - 17
EP - 24
JO - Debates in Neuroscience
JF - Debates in Neuroscience
IS - 1
ER -