TY - JOUR
T1 - Redistribution and market efficiency
T2 - An experimental study
AU - Großer, Jens
AU - Reuben, Ernesto
N1 - Funding Information:
Financial support from the GEW Foundation Cologne and the German Science Foundation (DFG) is gratefully acknowledged. We would also like to thank the Economics Laboratory of the University of Cologne for their help and hospitality.
PY - 2013/5
Y1 - 2013/5
N2 - We study the interaction between competitive markets and income redistribution that reallocates unequal pre-tax market incomes away from the rich to the poor majority. In one setup, participants earn their income by trading in a double auction (DA) with exogenous zero or full redistribution. In another setup, after trading, they vote on redistributive tax policies in a majoritarian election with two competing candidates. This results in virtually full redistribution, even when participants have the opportunity to influence taxes by transferring money to the candidates. We find that the high redistribution reduces trading efficiency, but not as much as predicted if market participants trade randomly. This is because, rather than capitulating to the much lower trading incentives, many participants respond to redistribution by asking and bidding more conservatively in the DA, and in this way help to prevent further efficiency losses.
AB - We study the interaction between competitive markets and income redistribution that reallocates unequal pre-tax market incomes away from the rich to the poor majority. In one setup, participants earn their income by trading in a double auction (DA) with exogenous zero or full redistribution. In another setup, after trading, they vote on redistributive tax policies in a majoritarian election with two competing candidates. This results in virtually full redistribution, even when participants have the opportunity to influence taxes by transferring money to the candidates. We find that the high redistribution reduces trading efficiency, but not as much as predicted if market participants trade randomly. This is because, rather than capitulating to the much lower trading incentives, many participants respond to redistribution by asking and bidding more conservatively in the DA, and in this way help to prevent further efficiency losses.
KW - Double auction
KW - Elections
KW - Lobbying
KW - Market efficiency
KW - Redistribution
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875629893&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875629893&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.02.002
DO - 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.02.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84875629893
SN - 0047-2727
VL - 101
SP - 39
EP - 52
JO - Journal of Public Economics
JF - Journal of Public Economics
IS - 1
ER -