Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare image quality and tumor assessment at prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging (rFOV-DWI) and standard DWI (st-DWI). Methods: Atotal of 49 patients undergoing prostateMRI and MRI/ultrasound fusion-targeted biopsy were included. Examinations included st-DWI (field of view [FOV], 200 × 200 mm) and rFOV-DWI (FOV, 140 × 64 mm) using a 2-dimensional (2D) spatially-selective radiofrequency pulse and parallel transmission. Two readers performed qualitative assessments; a third reader performed quantitative evaluation. Results: Overall image quality, anatomic distortion, visualization of capsule, and visualization of peripheral/transition zone edge were better for rFOV-DWI for reader 1 (P ≤ 0.002), although not for reader 2 (P ≥ 0.567). For both readers, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for tumor with a Gleason Score (GS) of 3 + 4 or higher were not different (P ≥ 0.289). Lesion clarity was higher for st-DWI for reader 2 (P = 0.008), although similar for reader 1 (P = 0.409). Diagnostic confidence was not different for either reader (P ≥ 0.052). Tumor-to-benign apparent diffusion coefficient ratio was not different (P = 0.675). Conclusions: Potentially improved image quality of rFOV-DWI did not yield improved tumor assessment. Continued optimization is warranted.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 949-956 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography |
Volume | 41 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2017 |
Keywords
- 3 T
- DWI
- MRI
- Prostate biopsy
- Prostatic cancer
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging