TY - JOUR
T1 - Reflections On Epidemiological Modeling To Inform Policy During The COVID-19 Pandemic In Western Europe, 2020–23
AU - Jit, Mark
AU - Ainslie, Kylie
AU - Althaus, Christian
AU - Caetano, Constantino
AU - Colizza, Vittoria
AU - Paolotti, Daniela
AU - Beutels, Philippe
AU - Willem, Lander
AU - Edmunds, John
AU - Nunes, Baltazar
AU - Namorado, Sónia
AU - Faes, Christel
AU - Low, Nicola
AU - Wallinga, Jacco
AU - Hens, Niel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, Project HOPE. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - We reflect on epidemiological modeling conducted throughout the COVID-19 pandemic in Western Europe, specifically in Belgium, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. Western Europe was initially one of the worst-hit regions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Western European countries deployed a range of policy responses to the pandemic, which were often informed by mathematical, computational, and statistical models. Models differed in terms of temporal scope, pandemic stage, interventions modeled, and analytical form. This diversity was modulated by differences in data availability and quality, government interventions, societal responses, and technical capacity. Many of these models were decisive to policy making at key junctures, such as during the introduction of vaccination and the emergence of the Alpha, Delta, and Omicron variants. However, models also faced intense criticism from the press, other scientists, and politicians around their accuracy and appropriateness for decision making. Hence, evaluating the success of models in terms of accuracy and influence is an essential task. Modeling needs to be supported by infrastructure for systems to collect and share data, model development, and collaboration between groups, as well as two-way engagement between modelers and both policy makers and the public.
AB - We reflect on epidemiological modeling conducted throughout the COVID-19 pandemic in Western Europe, specifically in Belgium, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. Western Europe was initially one of the worst-hit regions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Western European countries deployed a range of policy responses to the pandemic, which were often informed by mathematical, computational, and statistical models. Models differed in terms of temporal scope, pandemic stage, interventions modeled, and analytical form. This diversity was modulated by differences in data availability and quality, government interventions, societal responses, and technical capacity. Many of these models were decisive to policy making at key junctures, such as during the introduction of vaccination and the emergence of the Alpha, Delta, and Omicron variants. However, models also faced intense criticism from the press, other scientists, and politicians around their accuracy and appropriateness for decision making. Hence, evaluating the success of models in terms of accuracy and influence is an essential task. Modeling needs to be supported by infrastructure for systems to collect and share data, model development, and collaboration between groups, as well as two-way engagement between modelers and both policy makers and the public.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85178566867&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85178566867&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00688
DO - 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00688
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 38048502
AN - SCOPUS:85178566867
SN - 0278-2715
VL - 42
SP - 1630
EP - 1636
JO - Health Affairs
JF - Health Affairs
IS - 12
ER -