TY - JOUR
T1 - Regeneration of a Pediatric Alveolar Cleft Model Using Three-Dimensionally Printed Bioceramic Scaffolds and Osteogenic Agents
T2 - Comparison of Dipyridamole and rhBMP-2
AU - Lopez, Christopher D.
AU - Coelho, Paulo G.
AU - Witek, Lukasz
AU - Torroni, Andrea
AU - Greenberg, Michael I.
AU - Cuadrado, Dean L.
AU - Guarino, Audrey M.
AU - Bekisz, Jonathan M.
AU - Cronstein, Bruce N.
AU - Flores, Roberto L.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development (award R21HD090664) and the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (award R01AR068593 and award supplement R01AR068593-02S1).
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2019 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons
PY - 2019/8/1
Y1 - 2019/8/1
N2 - Background: Alveolar clefts are traditionally treated with secondary bone grafting, but this is associated with morbidity and graft resorption. Although recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) is under investigation for alveolar cleft repair, safety concerns remain. Dipyridamole is an adenosine receptor indirect agonist with known osteogenic potential. This study compared dipyridamole to rhBMP-2 at alveolar cleft defects delivered using bioceramic scaffolds. Methods: Skeletally immature New Zealand White rabbits underwent unilateral, 3.5 × 3.5-mm alveolar resection adjacent to the growing suture. Five served as negative controls. The remaining defects were reconstructed with three-dimensionally printed bioceramic scaffolds coated with 1000 μm of dipyridamole (n = 6), 10,000 μm of dipyridamole (n = 7), or 0.2 mg/ml of rhBMP-2 (n = 5). At 8 weeks, new bone was quantified. Nondecalcified histologic evaluation was performed, and new bone was evaluated mechanically. Statistical analysis was performed using a generalized linear mixed model and the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results: Negative controls did not heal, whereas new bone formation bridged all three-dimensionally printed bioceramic treatment groups. The 1000-μm dipyridamole scaffolds regenerated 28.03 ± 7.38 percent, 10,000-μm dipyridamole scaffolds regenerated 36.18 ± 6.83 percent (1000 μm versus 10,000 μm dipyridamole; p = 0.104), and rhBMP-2–coated scaffolds regenerated 37.17 ± 16.69 percent bone (p = 0.124 versus 1000 μm dipyridamole, and p = 0.938 versus 10,000 μm dipyridamole). On histology/electron microscopy, no changes in suture biology were evident for dipyridamole, whereas rhBMP-2 demonstrated early signs of suture fusion. Healing was highly cellular and vascularized across all groups. No statistical differences in mechanical properties were observed between either dipyridamole or rhBMP-2 compared with native bone. Conclusion: Dipyridamole generates new bone without osteolysis and early suture fusion associated with rhBMP-2 in skeletally immature bone defects. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 144: 358, 2019.)
AB - Background: Alveolar clefts are traditionally treated with secondary bone grafting, but this is associated with morbidity and graft resorption. Although recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) is under investigation for alveolar cleft repair, safety concerns remain. Dipyridamole is an adenosine receptor indirect agonist with known osteogenic potential. This study compared dipyridamole to rhBMP-2 at alveolar cleft defects delivered using bioceramic scaffolds. Methods: Skeletally immature New Zealand White rabbits underwent unilateral, 3.5 × 3.5-mm alveolar resection adjacent to the growing suture. Five served as negative controls. The remaining defects were reconstructed with three-dimensionally printed bioceramic scaffolds coated with 1000 μm of dipyridamole (n = 6), 10,000 μm of dipyridamole (n = 7), or 0.2 mg/ml of rhBMP-2 (n = 5). At 8 weeks, new bone was quantified. Nondecalcified histologic evaluation was performed, and new bone was evaluated mechanically. Statistical analysis was performed using a generalized linear mixed model and the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results: Negative controls did not heal, whereas new bone formation bridged all three-dimensionally printed bioceramic treatment groups. The 1000-μm dipyridamole scaffolds regenerated 28.03 ± 7.38 percent, 10,000-μm dipyridamole scaffolds regenerated 36.18 ± 6.83 percent (1000 μm versus 10,000 μm dipyridamole; p = 0.104), and rhBMP-2–coated scaffolds regenerated 37.17 ± 16.69 percent bone (p = 0.124 versus 1000 μm dipyridamole, and p = 0.938 versus 10,000 μm dipyridamole). On histology/electron microscopy, no changes in suture biology were evident for dipyridamole, whereas rhBMP-2 demonstrated early signs of suture fusion. Healing was highly cellular and vascularized across all groups. No statistical differences in mechanical properties were observed between either dipyridamole or rhBMP-2 compared with native bone. Conclusion: Dipyridamole generates new bone without osteolysis and early suture fusion associated with rhBMP-2 in skeletally immature bone defects. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 144: 358, 2019.)
KW - Alveolar Process/drug effects
KW - Animals
KW - Bone Density Conservation Agents/administration & dosage
KW - Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2/administration & dosage
KW - Bone Regeneration/drug effects
KW - Bone Transplantation/methods
KW - Dipyridamole/administration & dosage
KW - Disease Models, Animal
KW - Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
KW - Models, Animal
KW - Osteogenesis/drug effects
KW - Printing, Three-Dimensional
KW - Rabbits
KW - Recombinant Proteins/administration & dosage
KW - Tissue Scaffolds
KW - Transforming Growth Factor beta/administration & dosage
KW - X-Ray Microtomography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070652517&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070652517&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005840
DO - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005840
M3 - Article
C2 - 31348344
AN - SCOPUS:85070652517
SN - 0032-1052
VL - 144
SP - 358
EP - 370
JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
IS - 2
ER -