TY - JOUR
T1 - Regional variability in lithic miniaturization and the organization of technology in Late Glacial Southern Africa (~18-11 kcal BP)
AU - Low, Marika
AU - Pargeter, Justin
N1 - Funding Information:
Marika Low thanks Alex Mackay for access to the Klipfonteinrand assemblage and the Archaeology department at Cape Town University for providing lab space for analysis. Marika Low’s research has been conducted with the support of the Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship and by grants from the Centre for Archaeological Science and the University of Wollongong. Justin Pargeter thanks the Leakey Foundation, the National Science Foundation, and the Dan David Foundation for their generous financial support for his research. Peter Mitchell generously provided access to the Sehonghong lithic assemblage. Justin Pargeter also wishes to thank Pepper for providing the long walks and breaks that made the writing process a success.
Publisher Copyright:
© KONINKLIJKE BRILL NV, LEIDEN, 2020.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Miniaturized stone tools made by controlled fracture are reported from nearly every continent where archaeologists have systematically looked for them. While similarities in technology are acknowledged between regions, few detailed inter-regional comparative studies have been conducted. Our paper addresses this gap, presenting results of a comparative lithic technological study between Klipfonteinrand and Sehonghong – two large rock shelters in southern Africa. Both sites contain Late Glacial (~18-11 kcal BP) lithic assemblages, though they are located in regions with different geologies, climates and environments. Results demonstrate that lithic miniaturization manifests differently in these different regions. Both assemblages provide evidence for small blade production, though key differences exist in terms of the specific technological composition of this evidence, the raw materials selected, the role played by bipolar reduction and the manner in which lithic reduction was organized. Patterned variability of this nature demonstrates that humans deployed miniaturized technologies strategically in relation to local conditions.
AB - Miniaturized stone tools made by controlled fracture are reported from nearly every continent where archaeologists have systematically looked for them. While similarities in technology are acknowledged between regions, few detailed inter-regional comparative studies have been conducted. Our paper addresses this gap, presenting results of a comparative lithic technological study between Klipfonteinrand and Sehonghong – two large rock shelters in southern Africa. Both sites contain Late Glacial (~18-11 kcal BP) lithic assemblages, though they are located in regions with different geologies, climates and environments. Results demonstrate that lithic miniaturization manifests differently in these different regions. Both assemblages provide evidence for small blade production, though key differences exist in terms of the specific technological composition of this evidence, the raw materials selected, the role played by bipolar reduction and the manner in which lithic reduction was organized. Patterned variability of this nature demonstrates that humans deployed miniaturized technologies strategically in relation to local conditions.
KW - Late glacial
KW - Lithic miniaturization
KW - Organization of technology
KW - Southern africa
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089977474&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85089977474&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1163/21915784-20200007
DO - 10.1163/21915784-20200007
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85089977474
SN - 1612-1651
VL - 18
SP - 38
EP - 66
JO - Journal of African Archaeology
JF - Journal of African Archaeology
IS - 1
ER -