Regulatory Reform: Creating Gaps and Making Markets

CHRISTINE B. HARRINGTON

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This article argues that dispute processing reform, such as regulatory negotiation, plays a role in constructing a “crisis” in regulatory litigation and defining a new partnership between regulated interests and the state. Unlike traditional studies of regulatory reform, which tend to evaluate the behavioral impact of legal reform on policy, I argue that reforms themselves play a constitutive role in politics. The article examines the ideology of regulatory negotiation and presents empirical data on federal regulatory litigation in the U.S. Courts of Appeals (1940–1985), to demonstrate that this legal reform is part of a general drive toward a minimalist state.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)293-316
    Number of pages24
    JournalLaw & Policy
    Volume10
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Oct 1988

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science
    • Law

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Regulatory Reform: Creating Gaps and Making Markets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this