Relationship between community characteristics and impact of calorie labeling on fast-food purchases

Roxanne Dupuis, Marie A. Bragg, Lloyd Heng, Emil Hafeez, Erilia Wu, Tod Mijanovich, Beth C. Weitzman, Pasquale E. Rummo, Brian Elbel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate potential sources of heterogeneity in the effect of calorie labeling on fast-food purchases among restaurants located in areas with different neighborhood characteristics. Methods: In a quasi-experimental design, using transaction data from 2329 Taco Bell restaurants across the United States between 2008 and 2014, we estimated the relationships of census tract-level income, racial and ethnic composition, and urbanicity with the impacts of calorie labeling on calories purchased per transaction. Results: Calorie labeling led to small, absolute reductions in calories purchased across all population subgroups, ranging between −9.3 calories (95% CI: −18.7 to 0.0) and −37.6 calories (95% CI: −41.6 to −33.7) 2 years after labeling implementation. We observed the largest difference in the effect of calorie labeling between restaurants located in rural compared with those located in high-density urban census tracts 2 years after implementation, with the effect of calorie labeling being three times larger in urban areas. Conclusions: Fast-food calorie labeling led to small reductions in calories purchased across all population subgroups except for rural census tracts, with some subgroups experiencing a greater benefit.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)356-364
Number of pages9
JournalObesity
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2025

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Endocrinology
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Relationship between community characteristics and impact of calorie labeling on fast-food purchases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this