TY - JOUR
T1 - Remediation for buried pipeline systems under permanent ground deformation
AU - Choo, Yun Wook
AU - Abdoun, Tarek H.
AU - O'Rourke, Michael J.
AU - Ha, Da
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Korea Research Foundation Grant funded by the Korean Government (MOEHRD) (KRF-2005-214-D00373) and the George E. Brown, Jr. Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (NEES) Program of the National Science Foundation. The authors also acknowledge lab technicians who work with Rensselaer Geotechnical Centrifuge Center.
PY - 2007/12
Y1 - 2007/12
N2 - A remediation technique for buried pipeline system subject to permanent ground deformation is proposed. Specifically, expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam blocks are used as low-density backfill, thereby reducing soil restraint and pipeline strains. In order to evaluate this remediation technique, a series of 12 centrifuge model tests with HDPE pipe was performed. The amount or spatial extent of the low-density backfill was varied, as well as the orientation of the pipe with respect to the fault offset. Specifically, in the -63.5° test, the orientation was such that the pipe was placed in flexure and axial tension. The -85° orientation placed the pipe mainly in flexure. In all cases, the behavior of the remediated pipe was compared to that for the unremediated pipe. The geofoam backfill was successful in improving pipe behavior for two of the three pipe/fault orientations. However, for the 60° orientation, the pipe buckled in compression irrespective of the geofoam backfill. For compression, it is recommended that the pipe-fault angle be considered at the route selection stage to avoid compression loading.
AB - A remediation technique for buried pipeline system subject to permanent ground deformation is proposed. Specifically, expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam blocks are used as low-density backfill, thereby reducing soil restraint and pipeline strains. In order to evaluate this remediation technique, a series of 12 centrifuge model tests with HDPE pipe was performed. The amount or spatial extent of the low-density backfill was varied, as well as the orientation of the pipe with respect to the fault offset. Specifically, in the -63.5° test, the orientation was such that the pipe was placed in flexure and axial tension. The -85° orientation placed the pipe mainly in flexure. In all cases, the behavior of the remediated pipe was compared to that for the unremediated pipe. The geofoam backfill was successful in improving pipe behavior for two of the three pipe/fault orientations. However, for the 60° orientation, the pipe buckled in compression irrespective of the geofoam backfill. For compression, it is recommended that the pipe-fault angle be considered at the route selection stage to avoid compression loading.
KW - Centrifuge modeling
KW - EPS geofoam
KW - Low-density backfill
KW - Permanent ground deformation
KW - Pipeline
KW - Remediation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34748869614&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34748869614&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.04.002
DO - 10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.04.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:34748869614
SN - 0267-7261
VL - 27
SP - 1043
EP - 1055
JO - Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
JF - Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
IS - 12
ER -