REPLY Debate Around Leadership in the Stanford Prison Experiment: Reply to Zimbardo and Haney (2020) and Chan et al. (2020)

Stephen D. Reicher, Jay J. Van Bavel, S. Alexander Haslam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Access to the Stanford University archive has revealed new material that makes it possible to debate the precise nature and causes of events in the Stanford Prison Experiment. What the authors see as important is that these materials show the experimenters engaged in processes of identity leadership, which encouraged guard cruelty by presenting it as necessary for the achievement of noble collective goals. However, the authors encourage students, teachers, and researchers to engage with this new material themselves to explore alternative perspectives on what actually occurred in the study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)406-407
Number of pages2
JournalAmerican Psychologist
Volume75
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2020

Keywords

  • Stanford Prison Experiment
  • followership
  • leadership
  • open science
  • social identification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'REPLY Debate Around Leadership in the Stanford Prison Experiment: Reply to Zimbardo and Haney (2020) and Chan et al. (2020)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this