Reply to "comment on 'Intermittency exponent of the turbulent energy cascade' "

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review


In reply to Castaing's comment on Cleve [Phys. Rev. E 69, 066316 (2004)], we note that the discrepancy that exists between the air data and jet data in helium occurs at high Reynolds numbers. The helium data at high Reynolds numbers do not adequately resolve the small scales and so the dissipation statistics deduced from them should be used with caution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number068302
JournalPhysical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics
Issue number6
StatePublished - 2006

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
  • Statistics and Probability
  • Condensed Matter Physics


Dive into the research topics of 'Reply to "comment on 'Intermittency exponent of the turbulent energy cascade' "'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this