Reprint of "Does functional neuroimaging solve the questions of neurolinguistics?" [Brain and Language 98 (2006) 276-290]

Diana Van Lancker Sidtis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Neurolinguistic research has been engaged in evaluating models of language using measures from brain structure and function, and/or in investigating brain structure and function with respect to language representation using proposed models of language. While the aphasiological strategy, which classifies aphasias based on performance modality and a few linguistic variables, has been the most stable, cognitive neurolinguistics has had less success in reliably associating more elaborately proposed levels and units of language models with brain structure. Functional imaging emerged at this stage of neurolinguistic research. In this review article, it is proposed that the often-inconsistent superfluity of outcomes arising from functional imaging studies of language awaits adjustment at both "ends" of the process: model and data. Assumptions that our current language models consistently and reliably represent implicit knowledge within human cerebral processing are in line for major revision; and the promise of functional brain imaging to reveal any such knowledge structures must incorporate stable correlates of the imaging signal as dependent variable.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)200-214
Number of pages15
JournalBrain and Language
Issue number2
StatePublished - Aug 2007


  • Cerebral laterality
  • Functional neuroimaging
  • Language

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Speech and Hearing


Dive into the research topics of 'Reprint of "Does functional neuroimaging solve the questions of neurolinguistics?" [Brain and Language 98 (2006) 276-290]'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this