Resolving “Too Big to Fail”

Nicola Cetorelli, James Traina

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Using a synthetic control research design, we find that living will regulation increases a bank’s annual cost of capital by 22 bps, or 10% of total funding costs. This effect is stronger in banks measured as systemically important before the regulation’s announcement. We interpret our findings as a reduction in Too-Big-to-Fail subsidies. The effect size is large: multiplying our bank-specific point estimates by funding size implies a subsidy reduction of $42B annually. The impact on equity drives the main effect. The impact on deposits is statistically indistinguishable from zero, passing the placebo test for our empirical strategy.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    JournalJournal of Financial Services Research
    Volume60
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Aug 2021

    Keywords

    • Cost of capital
    • Dodd-Frank
    • Resolution plans
    • Time consistency
    • Too big to fail

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Accounting
    • Finance
    • Economics and Econometrics

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Resolving “Too Big to Fail”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this