TY - JOUR
T1 - Resource allocation, emergency response capability, and infrastructure concentration around vulnerable sites
AU - Simonoff, Jeffrey S.
AU - Restrepo, Carlos E.
AU - Zimmerman, Rae
AU - Naphtali, Zvia Segal
AU - Willis, Henry H.
N1 - Funding Information:
The need for systematic approaches to allocate funding from these grant programs has been specifically identified as a priority for critical infrastructure protection. Approaches to measure the exposure to risk for communities from accidents and terrorist attacks involving critical infrastructure risk can help to ensure that these substantial resources are used in the most effective ways. For example, the US DHS National Preparedness Guidelines (US Department of Homeland Security) state that the outcome for critical infrastructure protection is clearly risk-based, defined as follows:
Funding Information:
Several DHS grant programs directly or indirectly affect critical infrastructure risk in the USA by providing financial support for such protection including: Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) Infrastructure Protection Activities (IPA) grant program (which consists of seven separate programs allocated primarily either to urban areas or to infrastructure owners or operators, depending on the program), the State Homeland Security Grant Program, and the Urban Area Security Initiative. On 18 May 2008, the IPA distributed $844 million in awards, an increase of 28.9% over the FY 2007 amount of $655 million.
Funding Information:
DHS continues to develop analytic approaches to support decisions of how to allocate grants (US Department of Homeland Security, Office of Grants and Training 2006; US Department of Homeland Security, Preparedness Directorate’s Office of Grants and Training 2006; US Department of Homeland Security 2007). However, the limitations of these approaches have been identified (Cox 2008, 2009; US Government Accountability Office 2008) and much work remains to be done to develop alternative approaches.
PY - 2011/5
Y1 - 2011/5
N2 - Public and private decision-makers continue to seek risk-based approaches to allocate funds to help communities respond to disasters, accidents, and terrorist attacks involving critical infrastructure facilities. The requirements for emergency response capability depend both upon risks within a region's jurisdiction and mutual aid agreements that have been made with other regions. In general, regions in close proximity to infrastructure would benefit more from resources to improve preparedness because there is a greater potential for an event requiring emergency response to occur if there are more facilities at which such events could occur. Thus, a potentially important input into decisions about allocating funds for security is the proximity of a community to high concentrations of infrastructure systems that potentially could be at risk to an industrial accident, natural disaster, or terrorist attack. In this paper, we describe a methodology for measuring a region's exposure to infrastructure-related risks that captures both a community's concentration of facilities or sites considered to be vulnerable and of the proximity of these facilities to surrounding infrastructure systems. These measures are based on smoothing-based nonparametric probability density estimators, which are then used to estimate the probability of the entire infrastructure occurring within any specified distance of facilities in a county. The set of facilities used in the paper to illustrate the use of this methodology consists of facilities identified as vulnerable through the California Buffer Zone Protection Program. For infrastructure in surrounding areas we use dams judged to be high hazards, and BART tracks. The results show that the methodology provides information about patterns of critical infrastructure in regions that is relevant for decisions about how to allocate terrorism security and emergency preparedness resources.
AB - Public and private decision-makers continue to seek risk-based approaches to allocate funds to help communities respond to disasters, accidents, and terrorist attacks involving critical infrastructure facilities. The requirements for emergency response capability depend both upon risks within a region's jurisdiction and mutual aid agreements that have been made with other regions. In general, regions in close proximity to infrastructure would benefit more from resources to improve preparedness because there is a greater potential for an event requiring emergency response to occur if there are more facilities at which such events could occur. Thus, a potentially important input into decisions about allocating funds for security is the proximity of a community to high concentrations of infrastructure systems that potentially could be at risk to an industrial accident, natural disaster, or terrorist attack. In this paper, we describe a methodology for measuring a region's exposure to infrastructure-related risks that captures both a community's concentration of facilities or sites considered to be vulnerable and of the proximity of these facilities to surrounding infrastructure systems. These measures are based on smoothing-based nonparametric probability density estimators, which are then used to estimate the probability of the entire infrastructure occurring within any specified distance of facilities in a county. The set of facilities used in the paper to illustrate the use of this methodology consists of facilities identified as vulnerable through the California Buffer Zone Protection Program. For infrastructure in surrounding areas we use dams judged to be high hazards, and BART tracks. The results show that the methodology provides information about patterns of critical infrastructure in regions that is relevant for decisions about how to allocate terrorism security and emergency preparedness resources.
KW - critical infrastructure
KW - high hazard dams
KW - probability density estimation
KW - rapid transit
KW - resource allocation
KW - terrorist attacks
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960929621&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960929621&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13669877.2010.547257
DO - 10.1080/13669877.2010.547257
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:79960929621
SN - 1366-9877
VL - 14
SP - 597
EP - 613
JO - Journal of Risk Research
JF - Journal of Risk Research
IS - 5
ER -