TY - JOUR
T1 - Restrictive vs. non-restrictive composition
T2 - A magnetoencephalography study
AU - Leffel, Timothy
AU - Lauter, Miriam
AU - Westerlund, Masha
AU - Pylkkänen, Liina
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by the National Science Foundation [grant number BCS-1221723] (Liina Pylkkänen) and [grant number G1001] from the NYUAD Institute, New York University Abu Dhabi (Liina Pylkkänen).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 The Author(s).
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Recent research on the brain mechanisms underlying language processing has implicated the left anterior temporal lobe (LATL) as a central region for the composition of simple phrases. Because these studies typically present their critical stimuli without contextual information, the sensitivity of LATL responses to contextual factors is unknown. In this magnetoencephalography (MEG) study, we employed a simple question-answer paradigm to manipulate whether a prenominal adjective or determiner is interpreted restrictively, i.e., as limiting the set of entities under discussion. Our results show that the LATL is sensitive to restriction, with restrictive composition eliciting higher responses than non-restrictive composition. However, this effect was only observed when the restricting element was a determiner, adjectival stimuli showing the opposite pattern, which we hypothesise to be driven by the special pragmatic properties of non-restrictive adjectives. Overall, our results demonstrate a robust sensitivity of the LATL to high level contextual and potentially also pragmatic factors.
AB - Recent research on the brain mechanisms underlying language processing has implicated the left anterior temporal lobe (LATL) as a central region for the composition of simple phrases. Because these studies typically present their critical stimuli without contextual information, the sensitivity of LATL responses to contextual factors is unknown. In this magnetoencephalography (MEG) study, we employed a simple question-answer paradigm to manipulate whether a prenominal adjective or determiner is interpreted restrictively, i.e., as limiting the set of entities under discussion. Our results show that the LATL is sensitive to restriction, with restrictive composition eliciting higher responses than non-restrictive composition. However, this effect was only observed when the restricting element was a determiner, adjectival stimuli showing the opposite pattern, which we hypothesise to be driven by the special pragmatic properties of non-restrictive adjectives. Overall, our results demonstrate a robust sensitivity of the LATL to high level contextual and potentially also pragmatic factors.
KW - Composition
KW - Left anterior temporal lobe
KW - MEG
KW - Pragmatics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930625970&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930625970&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/23273798.2014.956765
DO - 10.1080/23273798.2014.956765
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84930625970
SN - 2327-3798
VL - 29
SP - 1191
EP - 1204
JO - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience
JF - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience
IS - 10
ER -