Rethinking Britain's Role in the World for a New Decade: The Limits of Discursive Therapy and the Promise of Field Theory

David M. Mccourt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Debate over the future of British foreign policy will doubtless invoke Britain's 'role in the world', but the interconnection between Britain's role as an analytical concept within the academic field and as a category within the political field renders this starting point problematic. It underpins a tendency to take descriptive statements for objective analysis, leaving the language of British foreign policy saturated with clichés and tropes-like the 'special relationship'-that constitute rather than describe Britain in the world. Given this, the present article assesses two theoretical approaches to UK foreign policy: discursive 'therapy', which denaturalises this language, and is both necessary but limited in its impact; and field theory, which enables a move beyond the level of discourse to the structure of British foreign policy knowledge and expertise creation. The latter approach is particularly promising for the attempt to say something new about Britain in world politics for the 2010s.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)145-164
Number of pages20
JournalBritish Journal of Politics and International Relations
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2011

Keywords

  • Britain
  • Discursive therapy
  • Field theory
  • Foreign policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rethinking Britain's Role in the World for a New Decade: The Limits of Discursive Therapy and the Promise of Field Theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this