TY - JOUR
T1 - Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension
AU - Van Dyke, Julie A.
AU - McElree, Brian
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by National Science Foundation grant (BCS-0236732) awarded to BM and by a National Research Service Award (NIH F32-HD049215-01) to JV. We thank Serafina Shishkova for her assistance in generating and norming the material used in the experiment.
PY - 2006/8
Y1 - 2006/8
N2 - The role of interference effects in sentence processing has recently begun to receive attention, however whether these effects arise during encoding or retrieval remains unclear. This paper draws on basic memory research to help distinguish these explanations and reports data from an experiment that manipulates the possibility for retrieval interference while holding encoding conditions constant. We found clear support for the principle of cue-overload, wherein cues available at retrieval cannot uniquely distinguish among competitors, thus giving rise to interference effects. We discuss the data in relation to a cue-based parsing framework (Van Dyke & Lewis, 2003) and other interference effects observed in sentence processing (e.g., Gordon, Hendrick, & Johnson, 2001, 2004). We conclude from the available data that the memory system that subserves language comprehension operates according to similar principles as memory in other domains.
AB - The role of interference effects in sentence processing has recently begun to receive attention, however whether these effects arise during encoding or retrieval remains unclear. This paper draws on basic memory research to help distinguish these explanations and reports data from an experiment that manipulates the possibility for retrieval interference while holding encoding conditions constant. We found clear support for the principle of cue-overload, wherein cues available at retrieval cannot uniquely distinguish among competitors, thus giving rise to interference effects. We discuss the data in relation to a cue-based parsing framework (Van Dyke & Lewis, 2003) and other interference effects observed in sentence processing (e.g., Gordon, Hendrick, & Johnson, 2001, 2004). We conclude from the available data that the memory system that subserves language comprehension operates according to similar principles as memory in other domains.
KW - Cue-overload
KW - Language comprehension
KW - Memory
KW - Parsing
KW - Retrieval interference
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745848795&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745848795&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jml.2006.03.007
DO - 10.1016/j.jml.2006.03.007
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:33745848795
SN - 0749-596X
VL - 55
SP - 157
EP - 166
JO - Journal of Memory and Language
JF - Journal of Memory and Language
IS - 2
ER -