TY - JOUR
T1 - Review of Walter Scheidel's the Great Leveler
T2 - Violence and the history of inequality from the Stone Age to the twenty-first century
AU - Easterly, William
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Economic Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the Twenty-first Century's thesis is that violence and only violence significantly reduces inequality. It shows supportive cases of violence reducing inequality, especially World War II and the Russian and Chinese Revolutions, and highlights recent peacetime increases in within-country inequality. The great virtue of the book is to present a lot of evidence on both sides for the readers to judge the thesis for themselves. Other historical evidence is not supportive. Other measures of inequality, like absolute poverty or inequality between countries or groups, show many examples of violence making inequality or deprivation worse. The unequal burden of conscription, rationing, and casualties may also show war to be dis-equalizing. Also against the thesis is that recent peaceful globalization of trade, investment, and migration flows, including the rapid growth of China and India, has arguably reduced global inequality and absolute poverty to a historic extent.
AB - The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the Twenty-first Century's thesis is that violence and only violence significantly reduces inequality. It shows supportive cases of violence reducing inequality, especially World War II and the Russian and Chinese Revolutions, and highlights recent peacetime increases in within-country inequality. The great virtue of the book is to present a lot of evidence on both sides for the readers to judge the thesis for themselves. Other historical evidence is not supportive. Other measures of inequality, like absolute poverty or inequality between countries or groups, show many examples of violence making inequality or deprivation worse. The unequal burden of conscription, rationing, and casualties may also show war to be dis-equalizing. Also against the thesis is that recent peaceful globalization of trade, investment, and migration flows, including the rapid growth of China and India, has arguably reduced global inequality and absolute poverty to a historic extent.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077433818&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85077433818&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1257/jel.20191477
DO - 10.1257/jel.20191477
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85077433818
SN - 0022-0515
VL - 57
SP - 955
EP - 971
JO - Journal of Economic Literature
JF - Journal of Economic Literature
IS - 4
ER -