Revisiting mothers' pensions: A critique of a social science classic and a new analysis

Sheera Joy Olasky, David F. Greenberg

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    We identify methodological weaknesses in a paper by Skocpol, AbendWein, Howard, and Lehmann (1993) on the origins of mothers' pensions in the American states in the early twentieth century. These include a sub-optimal and potentially biased strategy for assessing the impact of state characteristics on the time to adoption of pensions, as well as the use of a backward stepwise regression procedure for selecting independent variables. To determine whether Skocpol et al.'s conclusions remain valid, we recreated most of their dataset and used methods that are more appropriate for the analysis of duration data, including the Cox and complementary cloglog event history procedures. While we find support for several of their claims, our findings allow for a more straightforward interpretation of the role of explanatory variables, and the temporal dependence of the adoption process.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)93-119
    Number of pages27
    JournalResearch in Political Sociology
    Volume24
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2017

    Keywords

    • Event history analysis
    • Mothers' pensions
    • Skocpol
    • Stepwise regression
    • Welfare state
    • Women's associations

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Revisiting mothers' pensions: A critique of a social science classic and a new analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this